Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vaasan HAO 6.11.2006 06/0310/3 AI generated

Administrative court annuls environmental permit for startup emissions as they require separate production operation permit.

Case Number Vaasan HAO 6.11.2006 06/0310/3
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court annulled the city's environmental authority's decision regarding the startup of a new production line. The authority had approved the company's noise and steam emission notification, but the court ruled these activities were integral to the main production process. Consequently, such emissions can only be permitted within a separate production operation permit, not a general startup notification.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ympäristönsuojelulaki 60 §; 64 §: Startup emissions integral to production require separate production operation permit under environmental protection law.

Keywords

AI generated
startup emissions production operation permit environmental protection law noise emission notification steam discharge administrative annulment integrated production process

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ympäristönsuojelulaki 60 §
Ympäristönsuojelulaki 60 § ja 64 §
Ympäristönsuojelulaki 64 §
AI generated
kho-other_2015_305
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal against environmental permit regarding waste reception and leachate monitoring requirements.
kho-other_2022_19
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal regarding Best Available Technique requirement and special investigation order under Environmental Protection Act.
kho-other_2017_6084
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal regarding peat production permit validity despite alleged peatland type errors.
kho-other_2014_1755
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal against environmental permit regarding quarry noise and horse protection. Court finds no unreasonable burden on neighbors. Appeal dismissed.
kko-other_2023_1772
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding environmental damage as a condition for granting extension of residence permit.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kaupungin ympäristönsuojeluviranomainen oli valituksenalaisella päätöksellään hyväksynyt yhtiön meluilmoituksen, joka koski mm. tehtaan uuden tuotantolinjan käynnistykseen liittyviä soihdutuksia ja höyryn ulospuhalluksia.

Hallinto-oikeus kumosi päätöksen siltä osin kuin se koski em. uuden tuotantolinjan käynnistykseen liittyviä toimenpiteitä, koska toimenpiteet olivat sellaisia, jotka liittyivät tehtaan varsinaiseen tuotantoon siinä määrin, että ne voitiin sallia vasta toimintaa koskevan ympäristöluvan yhteydessä.

Ympäristönsuojelulaki 60 § ja 64 §