Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Turun HAO 29.12.2006 06/0961/2 AI generated

Administrative court dismisses private foster care director's appeal as they lack standing to challenge social board decisions.

Case Number Turun HAO 29.12.2006 06/0961/2
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Turku dismissed the appeal filed by the director of a private foster care facility regarding a social board's decision to change a child's placement. The court determined that the director did not have the legal standing to challenge the decision because the facility's representative lacked the authority to act on behalf of the organization in this specific context. Consequently, the appeal was rejected without further examination of the merits of the placement change.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Lastensuojelulaki 35 § 2 mom; A private foster care facility director lacks standing to file an administrative appeal against a social board's decision altering a child's foster care placement when the facility's designated representative does not possess the requisite authority to represent the organization in such proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
private foster care director standing to appeal social board decision child placement change administrative court jurisdiction representative authority Lastensuojelulaki

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Lastensuojelulaki 35 § 2 mom
Lastensuojelulaki 35 § 2 mom

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Turun ja Porin LO 21.5.1992 taltionumero 488/2
toisin Turun ja Porin LO 21.5.1992 taltionumero 488/2
AI generated
kho-precedent_2003_24
Supreme Administrative Court quashes lower court decision due to judge's conflict of interest as subordinate of decision-making body.
admin_1992_turku-and-pori-county__488
Private foster home director granted appeal right against social board's placement change decision.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2022:59
Appeal against emergency placement change decision dismissed; no right to appeal under Child Protection Act 92 §.
admin_2014_hameenlinna__556
Administrative court dismissed appeal due to procedural error and invalid transition period in waste management decision.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2020:49
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal against lower court dismissal of child placement change due to foster carer rights.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ratkaistavana oli kysymys, onko yksityisen lastensuojelulaitoksen johtajalla valitusoikeus sosiaalilautakunnan päätöksestä, jolla laitoksessa olevan lapsen sijaishuoltoa muutetaan.

Hallinto-oikeus ei tutkinut Y:n valitusta. Huostaanotetun lapsen sijaishuolto oli järjestetty X:n Perhekoti Oy -nimisessä yksityisessä lastensuojelulaitoksessa. Y:llä ei tämän laitoksen edustajana ollut oikeutta hakea muutosta lautakunnan päätökseen.

Lastensuojelulaki 35 § 2 mom

Vahvennettu kokoonpano

Vrt. toisin Turun ja Porin LO 21.5.1992 taltionumero 488/2