Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Rovaniemen HAO 7.6.2004 04/0306/1 AI generated

Gun possession permit denied due to prior hunting offense and domestic violence suspicion.

Case Number Rovaniemen HAO 7.6.2004 04/0306/1
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's appeal for a gun possession permit, upholding the police authority's refusal. The applicant argued for the permit based on hunting and sports interests, while the police rejected it citing a recent hunting offense and suspicion of inciting domestic violence. The court ruled that the applicant's prior criminal record and unresolved domestic dispute constituted sufficient grounds to deny the permit under the Gun Possession Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ampuma-aselaki 54 § 1 mom; Ampuma-aselaki 45 § 1 mom: A gun possession permit may be denied if the applicant has committed a hunting offense or faces suspicion of domestic violence, as these factors indicate a risk to public safety.

Keywords

AI generated
gun possession permit hunting offense domestic violence suspicion Administrative Court public safety risk

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ampuma-aselaki 54 § 1 mom
Ampuma-aselaki 54 § 1 mom
Ampuma-aselaki 45 § 1 mom
Ampuma-aselaki 45 § 1 mom
AI generated
ECLI:FI:KHO:2021:157
Permanent residence denied due to criminal suspicion requires full discretion assessment under Finnish immigration law.
kho-precedent_2013_190
Supreme Administrative Court quashes police decision denying taxi license due to old crimes outside five-year window.
admin_2021_eastern-finland__63
Court allows revocation of firearm license for gross drunk driving due to demonstrated danger to public safety.
admin_2021_eastern-finland__82
Court dismisses appeal as police correctly assessed applicant's suitability based on past serious crimes.
kko-precedent_2012_16
Supreme Court partially dismissed self-incrimination defense for accomplice in Finnish fraud case regarding asset concealment.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A oli hakenut lupaa ampuma-aseiden hallussapitoon metsästys- ja urheiluharrastuksiin vedoten. Poliisilaitos oli hylännyt hakemuksen ja perustellut päätöstään muun ohella sillä, että A oli syyllistynyt metsästysrikokseen noin kaksi vuotta aiemmin. Lisäksi A:ta oli epäilty yllytyksestä avopuolisonsa pahoinpitelyyn, josta tosin ei ollut nostettu syytettä esitutkintakertomusten ristiriitaisuuden vuoksi. Hallinto-oikeus hylkäsi A:n valituksen ja ottaen huomioon myös esitutkintakertomuksista ilmi käyvät seikat pysytti poliisilaitoksen kokonaisarviointiin perustuvan päätöksen.

Ampuma-aselaki 54 § 1 mom

Ampuma-aselaki 45 § 1 mom