Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vaasan HAO 2.10.2003 03/0195/3 AI generated

Administrative court quiesced environmental permit due to procedural hearing error under Environmental Protection Act.

Case Number Vaasan HAO 2.10.2003 03/0195/3
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Finland quashed the municipality's environmental permit decision for Company A and remanded the case for re-examination due to a procedural hearing error. Company B, a neighboring property owner, successfully argued that the initial decision violated statutory requirements for proper public participation. The court ruled that the violation of the Environmental Protection Act necessitated the decision's invalidation to ensure procedural compliance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ympäristönsuojelulaki 37 § 1 mom; 38 § 2 mom: A decision on an environmental permit is void if the statutory hearing procedure was not properly conducted, requiring the case to be remanded for a new examination.

Keywords

AI generated
Environmental Protection Act hearing procedure violation permit quashing administrative review procedural fairness remand for re-examination neighbor rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ympäristönsuojelulaki 37 § 1 mom
Ympäristönsuojelulaki 38 § 2 mom
AI generated
admin_2005_vaasa__3
Administrative court dismissed appeal for lack of standing under environmental protection law and ordered costs.
admin_2015_aland__16
Administrative court dismisses appeal against environmental review decision due to lack of hearing for co-owners and public notice.
kho-other_2016_4211
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal against environmental permit for peat production regarding groundwater protection. The court upholds the lower court's decision based on the Water Management Plan. The court finds the permit compliant with environmental standards despite proximity to groundwater areas. The decision emphasizes that the Water Management Plan's ecological status assessment is decisive for permit approval. The court rejects arguments that the permit violates groundwater protection laws. The ruling confirms the validity of the administrative decision under Finnish environmental law.
kho-other_2017_5881
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal regarding environmental permit where heirs lack standing for third-party claims.
kho-other_2014_1353
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; environmental permit denied due to missing badger impact assessment.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kunnan ympäristönsuojeluviranomainen oli myöntänyt yhtiölle A ympäristöluvan polttonesteiden jakeluasemalle sekä autonpesuhallille. Naapurikiinteistöllä vuokraoikeuden nojalla toimivan yhtiön B:n valituksesta HAO kumosi päätöksen ja palautti asian uudelleen käsiteltäväksi kuulemisvirheen vuoksi.

YmpäristönsuojeluL 37 § 1 mom

YmpäristönsuojeluL 38 § 2 mom

Lainvoimainen