Hämeenlinnan HAO 30.1.2002 02/0038/2 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed appeal against building permit where state agency had statutory right of objection.

Case Number Hämeenlinnan HAO 30.1.2002 02/0038/2

Court / Authority Hallinto-oikeus

Jurisdiction

Finland (FI)

Decision Date 30.01.2002

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Finland dismissed the applicant's appeal against a building permit decision. The state agency, as the holder of the adjacent land, successfully argued its statutory right of objection under the Planning and Building Act. The court upheld the permit because the agency's objection right was properly exercised and the decision complied with the relevant statutory provisions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 192 § 1 mom 1 kohta; The state agency, as the holder of the adjacent land, has a statutory right of objection to building permits, and the court must respect this procedural right when reviewing the legality of the decision.

Keywords

AI generated

adjacent land holder statutory right of objection building permit legality administrative review Planning and Building Act

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 192 § 1 mom 1 kohta

Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 192 § 1 mom 1 kohta

AI generated

admin_2001_hameenlinna__623

Construction permit revoked because driveway location violated traffic safety requirements under Planning and Building Act.

kho-other_2017_697

Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal regarding planning scheme legality and council member disqualification. The court rejects claims about nature protection and council member bias. The court holds that planning scheme legality depends on specific statutory criteria. The court dismisses the appeal as the lower court's decision stands. The court finds no legal basis to overturn the lower court's ruling. The court emphasizes strict adherence to statutory requirements for planning schemes. The court concludes that the lower court's decision is legally sound and final.

kho-other_2016_4294

Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against planning permission denial for livestock farm expansion on planning need area.

kho-other_2021_5

Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal, ruling LED billboard on parkland violates traffic safety and suitability requirements.

kho-precedent_2002_40

Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal as building site is not opposite or adjacent to appellant's land.

Full text

Rakennuspaikka sijaitsi valtatie 3:n vieressä. Tielaitoksella oli rakennuspaikan viereisen alueen haltijana valitusoikeus rakennuslupapäätöksestä.

Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 192 § 1 mom 1 kohta