Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Hämeenlinnan HAO 12.6.2001 01/0298/4 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed immediate appeal request, remanding disability benefit case for re-examination by authority.

Case Number Hämeenlinnan HAO 12.6.2001 01/0298/4
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Finland dismissed the applicant's request for an immediate decision, remanding the disability allowance case to the Social and Health Board for re-examination. The applicant argued for a direct ruling, but the court noted the first-instance authority had not resolved the matter at all. Consequently, the court held that immediate adjudication was unnecessary as the authority still needed to conduct a substantive review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Vammaispalvelulaki 9 § 1 mom; Vammaispalveluasetus 17 §: When the first-instance authority fails to resolve the case substantively, the administrative court must remand the matter rather than decide immediately to avoid procedural delay.

Keywords

AI generated
disability allowance administrative review immediate decision remand procedure procedural delay

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Vammaispalvelulaki 9 § 1 mom
Vammaispalvelulaki 9 § 1 mom
Vammaispalveluasetus 17 §
Vammaispalveluasetus 17 §

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KHO:n päätös 12.11.2002 taltionumero 2943
KHO:n päätös 12.11.2002 taltionumero 2943.
AI generated
admin_2003_kuopio__294
Social Board not liable for costs when Administrative Court remands case due to unresolved facts.
kho-precedent_2004_75
Supreme Administrative Court quashes decisions for failing to notify a permanent holder of a public office of termination.
admin_1989_aland-county__65
Appeal dismissed because social support revocation was not yet legally determined by the social committee.
kho-precedent_2009_69
Supreme Administrative Court annuls lower court decision for failing to examine a valid social care appeal.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2017:201
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal; unionized official's wage dispute belongs to labor court, not administrative court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Hallinto-oikeus kumosi ja palautti sosiaali- ja terveyslautakunnan vammaispalvelulain mukaisen päätöksen lautakunnan uudelleen käsiteltäväksi. Muutoksenhakija oli hallinto-oikeudessa vaatinut paitsi päätöksen kumoamista myös hakemuksen välitöntä ratkaisemista hallinto-oikeudessa. Hallinto-oikeus ei kuitenkaan ottanut asiaa viivytyksen välttämiseksi ratkaistavakseen, koska hallintoviranomainen ei ollut ensiasteena miltään osin ratkaissut asiaa. Kysymyksessä oli määrärahasidonnainen etuus. Asian palauttamisesta hallintoviranomaisen käsiteltäväksi ei näin ollen seurannut sellaista oikeudenmenetystä, että asia olisi ollut syytä viivytyksen välttämiseksi ratkaista välittömästi hallinto-oikeudessa.

Vammaispalvelulaki 9 § 1 mom

Vammaispalveluasetus 17 §

KHO:n päätös 12.11.2002 taltionumero 2943. Päätöstä ei muuteta.

KHO:n lyhyt ratkaisuseloste.