Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Kuopion HAO 23.5.2000 609 AI generated

Administrative court held that timely termination decision timing matters more than delivery method for probationary employment end.

Case Number Kuopion HAO 23.5.2000 609
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court ruled that the timing of a termination decision during a probationary period determines the employment's end, not its delivery method. The Youth Council terminated the probationary employment within the statutory timeframe, making the decision valid despite postal delivery delays. Consequently, the court found the council's decision lawful and the timing of receipt irrelevant to the employment's conclusion.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Laki kunnallisen viranhaltijan palvelussuhdeturvasta 4 §; 13 § 2 mom.: The termination of a probationary public service relationship is effective upon the timely making of the decision, regardless of when the recipient actually receives the notification.

Keywords

AI generated
probationary employment termination timely decision making public service relationship notification timing relevance administrative law principle

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Laki kunnallisen viranhaltijan palvelussuhdeturvasta 4 §
Laki kunnallisen viranhaltijan palvelussuhdeturvasta 4 §
Laki kunnallisen viranhaltijan palvelussuhdeturvasta 13 § 2 mom.
AI generated
kho-other_2016_79
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses request to annul Sami election board decision on voting rights eligibility.
kko-precedent_2003_55
Supreme Court annuls document death ruling because applicant could not reasonably rely on document being in their possession.
kko-other_2001_90
Supreme Court dismissed appeal where insurance company stamp delayed filing but actual submission was timely.
kko-other_2016_148
Supreme Court dismisses late insurance appeal due to insurer's failure to verify claimant's knowledge of the decision.
kko-precedent_2006_85
Supreme Court allows compensation claim for wrongful detention where post delivery notice was not proven received.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Virkasuhteen purkamispäätöksen tiedoksiannon merkitys

virkasuhteen päättymisen kannalta.

Mikkelin nuorisolautakunta oli purkanut nuoriso-ohjaajan

virkasuhteen päättymään koeajan kuluessa. Purkupäätös oli

annettu nuoriso-ohjaajalle tiedoksi postitse ja asiassa oli

riitaa siitä, milloin nuoriso-ohjaajan oli katsottava saaneen

purkupäätöksen tiedoksi.

Hallinto-oikeus katsoi, että molemmilla osapuolilla on mahdollisuus

koeajan kuluessa purkaa virkasuhde päättymään välittömästi

ja että virkasuhteen purkaminen oli tapahtunut

koeajan kuluessa, kun päätös oli tehty säädetyssä ajassa.

Purkupäätöksen tiedoksiannolla ei ollut merkitystä virkasuhteen

päättymisajankohdan kannalta. Lautakunnan päätös ei

ollut lainvastainen.

Laki kunnallisen viranhaltijan palvelussuhdeturvasta 4 §

Laki kunnallisen viranhaltijan palvelussuhdeturvasta 13 §

2 mom.