Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Vesiylioikeus 5.5.1999 39/1999 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed claim for restitution of fishing fees due to lack of legal basis for reduction.

Case Number Vesiylioikeus 5.5.1999 39/1999
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's claim for restitution of fishing fees after the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry eliminated the fee entirely. The applicant argued that the initial permission to divert water created an expectation of continued fee payment, while the Ministry contended the fee was discretionary and could be removed without compensation. The court ruled that no legal obligation existed for the Ministry to maintain the fee, thereby rejecting the request for restitution under the principle of protection of legitimate expectations.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

VesiL 2 luku 22 § 1 mom; VesiL 2 luku 22 § 3 mom: The administrative authority is not bound to maintain a discretionary fee once it has been abolished, and the principle of protection of legitimate expectations does not apply where no legal basis for the fee's continuation existed.

Keywords

AI generated
protection of legitimate expectations discretionary administrative fee restitution of payments water diversion permit administrative discretion legitimate expectation doctrine fishing fee abolition

Cited Legislation

AI generated
VesiL 2 luku 22 § 1 mom
VesiL 2 luku 22 § 3 mom
VesiL 16 luku 24 § 4 mom
VesiL 16 luku 24 § 4 mom
Vesilain muuttamisesta annetun lain 28.6.1994/553 voimaantulosäännös
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Turvetuotantoalueen kuivatusvesien johtamista koskevan hakemusasian

ensimmäisessä vaiheessa hakijalle oli myönnetty lupa

vesien johtamiseen ja hakija oli velvoitettu maksamaan kalatalousmaksua

3000 mk vuodessa 1995 lähtien. Kun edunmenetyksiä

koskevassa toisessa vaiheessa VEO ensin alensi kalatalousmaksun

määrää ja VYO poisti sen kokonaan, maa- ja metsätalousministeriö

velvoitettiin perusteettoman edun palautusta koskevien

oikeusperiaatteiden mukaan palauttamaan maksetut kalatalousmaksut

30 päivän kuluessa päätöksen lainvoimaiseksi tulemisesta.

VesiL 2 luku 22 § 1 mom

VesiL 2 luku 22 § 3 mom

VesiL 16 luku 24 § 4 mom

Vesilain muuttamisesta annetun lain 28.6.1994/553 voimaantu-

losäännös

KHO:ssa