Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Uudenmaan LO 23.9.1999 99/0846/7 AI generated

Administrative court dismisses customs official's appeal regarding a discretionary bankruptcy trustee storage permit.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 23.9.1999 99/0846/7
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Uusimaa dismissed the customs official's appeal against a decision to reject a bankruptcy trustee's application for a tax-exempt storage permit. The bankruptcy trustee had already decided not to challenge the initial rejection in the creditors' meeting, and the permit application was a discretionary matter initiated only by the applicant. Since no public interest was at stake and the applicant had waived the right to contest, the court held the customs official's complaint inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Valmisteverotuslaki 8 §; Discretionary administrative decisions regarding private interests require applicant initiation and cannot be challenged by officials if the applicant has waived the right to appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
bankruptcy trustee storage permit discretionary power waiver of appeal public interest administrative court inadmissible complaint

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Valmisteverotuslaki 8 §
AI generated
admin_2012_turku__172
Administrative Court dismissed Customs Board's appeal against State Office's reimbursement decision due to lack of statutory standing.
admin_2007_helsinki__1187
Court dismisses duty-free exemption for sports drinks classified as special food preparations under tariff headings.
kho-precedent_2010_45
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed VAT refund request due to lack of legal certainty and missed appeal deadlines.
admin_2001_helsinki__541
Bankruptcy estate's short-term business activity did not generate taxable turnover under Finnish Income Tax Act.
market_2016_634
Market Court dismisses bid protest; procurement authority not required to verify all tenderer data proactively.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Tullihallitus oli hylännyt konkurssipesän hakemuksen, joka

koski lupaa toimia valtuutettuna varastonpitäjänä ja pitää

verotonta varastoa. Konkurssipesä oli käsitellyt asiaa velkojainkokouksessa,

jossa oli päätetty, ettei konkurssipesä

hae muutosta päätökseen. Lupahakemuksen tekeminen oli dispositiivinen

asia, joka ei voi tulla vireille viranomaisen

aloitteesta. Vastaavasti kysymys siitä, haettiinko tullihallituksen

kielteiseen päätökseen muutosta, oli luvan hakijan

päätettävissä. Tämän vuoksi ja kun viranomaisen valvottavana

ei asiassa ollut julkista etua, tullihallituksen

tulliasiamiehen valitus, jossa hän vaati, että konkurssipesälle

on myönnettävä haettu lupa, jätettiin tutkimatta.

Valmisteverotuslaki 8 §