Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Uudenmaan LO 12.1.1999 3/7 AI generated

VAT court dismissed claim that indirect construction costs are deductible input tax base items.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 12.1.1999 3/7
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the taxpayer's claim to deduct indirect construction costs from the VAT base. The taxpayer argued that financing costs incurred during the construction period should be treated as direct input tax, but the court found these to be indirect expenses. Consequently, the court ruled that only direct costs related to the construction activity qualify for VAT deduction under the relevant sections of the Value Added Tax Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Arvonlisäverolaki 1 §; Arvonlisäverolaki 22 §; Arvonlisäverolaki 75 § 1 mom 2 kohta: Indirect financing costs incurred during construction are not deductible as input tax, as only direct costs attributable to the taxable activity qualify for deduction.

Keywords

AI generated
Value Added Tax input tax deduction indirect construction costs financing costs VAT base calculation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Value Added Tax Act section 1
Arvonlisäverolaki 75 § 1 mom 2 kohta (1486/94)
Value Added Tax Act section 22
Value Added Tax Act section 75 subsection 1 paragraph 2 point (1486/94)
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rakennusliike harjoitti talojen rakentamista perustajaurakointina.

Yhtiön toimintaan kokonaisuutena kohdistuvat

rahoituskustannukset eivät olleet osaksikaan sellaisia

rakentamisesta aiheutuneita välillisiä kustannuksia,

jotka olisi tullut lukea veron perusteeseen. Kuukaudet

7/94-9/95.

Arvonlisäverolaki 1 §

Arvonlisäverolaki 22 §

Arvonlisäverolaki 75 § 1 mom 2 kohta (1486/94)