Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Keski-Suomen LO 26.2.1999 78 AI generated

Employment center denied private party reimbursement for litigation costs due to lack of respondent status.

Case Number Keski-Suomen LO 26.2.1999 78
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the employment and economic center's request for reimbursement of litigation costs from a private party. The court found that the private individual was not a respondent in the administrative proceedings and thus had no obligation to cover costs. Consequently, the court ruled that the employment center lacked the legal basis to claim such expenses.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

HallintolainkäyttöL 74 § 1 mom; 74 § 3 mom: A public body cannot claim litigation costs from a private party if that party was not a respondent in the administrative proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
litigation cost reimbursement employment center liability private party respondent administrative proceedings status costs allocation rule

Cited Legislation

AI generated
HallintolainkäyttöL 74 § 1 mom
HallintolainkäyttöL 74 § 1 mom
HallintolainkäyttöL 74 § 3 mom
HallintolainkäyttöL 74 § 3 mom

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KHO:n päätös 20.11.2000 taltionumero 2982
KHO:n päätös 20.11.2000 taltionumero 2982.
AI generated
kko-other_1998_3045
Supreme Court dismissed state's duty to pay legal costs in a salary security case.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2024:117
Military service pay denied for early resignation; court upholds employer's refusal based on statutory purpose.
kho-precedent_2012_54
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal against civil servant status changes under strict constitutional review.
kko-other_2010_2462
Supreme Court dismisses appeal withdrawal objection, ruling withdrawal does not automatically suspend oral hearing proceedings.
insurance_2008_2355-2008
Social security appeal board dismissed appeal; insurance court remanded case for missing evidence collection.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

KHO on muuttanut lääninoikeuden päätöstä. KHO:n päätöksen viitetiedot näkyvät ennakkotapauksen lopussa.

Työvoima- ja elinkeinokeskuksella ei ollut oikeutta saada korvausta oikeudenkäyntikuluistaan yksityiseltä asianosaiselta työllistämistuen takaisinperimistä koskevassa hakemusasiassa, jossa työvoima- ja elinkeinokeskus oli hakijana, koska yksityinen asianosainen ei ollut tuossa hallintoriita-asiassa vastaajan asemassa esittänyt mitään vaatimuksia.

HallintolainkäyttöL 74 § 1 mom

HallintolainkäyttöL 74 § 3 mom

KHO:n päätös 20.11.2000 taltionumero 2982. Päätöstä muutetaan.