Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Uudenmaan LO 15.10.1998 934/6 AI generated

Private investigation firm's use of firearms deemed unnecessary under private investigation act provisions.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 15.10.1998 934/6
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the private investigation firm's complaint regarding the necessity of firearms for its employees. The firm argued that carrying weapons was essential for their private investigation work, but the court found no evidence supporting this claim. Consequently, the court ruled that firearms were not required under the specific provisions of the Private Investigation Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ampuma-asetta 43 § 1 mom 3 kohta; The court held that carrying firearms is not considered necessary for the performance of private investigation duties under the Private Investigation Act.

Keywords

AI generated
private investigation firearm necessity private investigation act administrative court employee equipment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ampuma-asetta 43 § 1 mom 3 kohta
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ampuma-asetta ei pidetty ampuma-aselaissa tarkoitetulla

tavalla välttämättömänä yksityisetsivätoimiston perustaneen

henkilön yksityisetsivän työssä.

Ampuma-aseL 43 § 1 mom 3 kohta