Private investigation firm's use of firearms deemed unnecessary under private investigation act provisions.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Administrative Court dismissed the private investigation firm's complaint regarding the necessity of firearms for its employees. The firm argued that carrying weapons was essential for their private investigation work, but the court found no evidence supporting this claim. Consequently, the court ruled that firearms were not required under the specific provisions of the Private Investigation Act.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedAmpuma-asetta 43 § 1 mom 3 kohta; The court held that carrying firearms is not considered necessary for the performance of private investigation duties under the Private Investigation Act.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Ampuma-asetta ei pidetty ampuma-aselaissa tarkoitetulla
tavalla välttämättömänä yksityisetsivätoimiston perustaneen
henkilön yksityisetsivän työssä.
Ampuma-aseL 43 § 1 mom 3 kohta