Firearms Act provision requiring a firearm for security work deemed inapplicable to sole employee.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Administrative Court allowed the plaintiff's claim regarding the inapplicability of the Firearms Act's requirement for a firearm in security work. The plaintiff, the sole employee of a security company, argued that a firearm was not necessary for his individual duties. The court agreed, finding the statutory requirement did not apply to his specific circumstances as the only worker.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedAmpuma-aseL 43 § 1 mom 3 kohta; The requirement for a firearm in security work does not apply when the sole employee performs duties where a firearm is not deemed necessary.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
A toimi kommandiittiyhtiön vastuunalaisena yhtiömiehenä
vartioalan yrityksessä sen ainoana työntekijänä. Ampumaasetta
ei pidetty ampuma-aselaissa tarkoitetulla tavalla
välttämättömänä hänen yksin suorittamissaan vartiointiteh-
tävissä.
Ampuma-aseL 43 § 1 mom 3 kohta