Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Uudenmaan LO 15.10.1998 933/6 AI generated

Firearms Act provision requiring a firearm for security work deemed inapplicable to sole employee.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 15.10.1998 933/6
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court allowed the plaintiff's claim regarding the inapplicability of the Firearms Act's requirement for a firearm in security work. The plaintiff, the sole employee of a security company, argued that a firearm was not necessary for his individual duties. The court agreed, finding the statutory requirement did not apply to his specific circumstances as the only worker.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ampuma-aseL 43 § 1 mom 3 kohta; The requirement for a firearm in security work does not apply when the sole employee performs duties where a firearm is not deemed necessary.

Keywords

AI generated
Firearms Act security work sole employee firearm requirement administrative court necessity standard individual duties

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ampuma-aseL 43 § 1 mom 3 kohta
Ampuma-aseL 43 § 1 mom 3 kohta
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A toimi kommandiittiyhtiön vastuunalaisena yhtiömiehenä

vartioalan yrityksessä sen ainoana työntekijänä. Ampumaasetta

ei pidetty ampuma-aselaissa tarkoitetulla tavalla

välttämättömänä hänen yksin suorittamissaan vartiointiteh-

tävissä.

Ampuma-aseL 43 § 1 mom 3 kohta