Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Uudenmaan LO 24.3.1998 213/5 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed appeal; building inspection without board members was not procedural error.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 24.3.1998 213/5
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The administrative court dismissed the appeal against the building permit decision. Although the required inspection under the Building Act did not include a member of the building committee, the court found no procedural error. The court ruled that the statute does not mandate the presence of committee members for the inspection, rendering the absence acceptable.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Rakennusasetus 52 § 1 momentti; Rakennuslautakunnan jäsenien osallistumattomuus katselmuksessa ei ole menettelyvirhe, jos lain mukaan se ei ole pakollista.

Keywords

AI generated
building permit procedure mandatory inspection requirement building committee members procedural error standard administrative review outcome

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Rakennusasetus 52 § 1 momentti
AI generated
kho-precedent_2015_143
Supreme Administrative Court requires leave for appeal on non-compulsory building enforcement decisions under Construction Act. Verdict: dismissed. Leave denied.
kko-other_1999_3370
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when applicant withdraws asylum claim, leaving no case to review.
kho-precedent_2011_23
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal where building permit conditions were not met but decision was legally reviewable.
admin_1986_aland-county__64
Co-owner's right to attend building committee meeting regarding neighbor's construction permit denial is allowed.
admin_1999_water-superior__88
Administrative court quashed water permit due to failure to consult affected parties before decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ennen kuin rakennuslupahakemus ratkaistaan, rakennuspaikalla

on rakennusasetuksen 52 §:n 1 momentin mukaan toimitettava

rakennuksen ympäristöön soveltuvuuden selvittämiseksi,

rakentamisen vaikutusten arvioimiseksi ja naapurien kuulemiseksi

katselmus, jollei sitä ole pidettävä tarpeettomana.

Ennan rakennuslautakunnan ratkaisua rakennuslupa-asiassa

olivat kaupungin rakennusvalvontaviraston virkamiehet toimittaneet

rakennuspaikalla katselmuksen. Katselmuksessa ei

ollut läsnä rakennuslautakunnan jäseniä. Kun otettiin huomioon,

ettei edellä mainitussa säännöksessä ole määrätty,

kenen asiana katselmuksen toimittaminen on, menettely asian

ratkaisemisessa ei ollut virheellistä, vaikka katselmuksessa

ei ollut yhtään rakennuslautakunnan jäsentä. Äänestys 2-1.

RakennusA 52 §