Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Mikkelin LO 17.12.1998 665 AI generated

Late appeal dismissed because failure to notify did not affect the appeal period's start.

Case Number Mikkelin LO 17.12.1998 665
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the appeal filed by A against the municipality's decision to grant a land material permit. Although the municipality failed to notify A of the permit decision as required by law, the appeal was submitted after the statutory deadline for filing. The court determined that this procedural failure did not alter the commencement of the appeal period, rendering the late submission inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Maa-aineslain 19 § 2 momentti; The failure of an authority to notify a party of a permit decision does not extend the time limit for filing an appeal if the appeal is submitted after the deadline has expired.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative appeal period failure to notify land material permit procedural deadline late filing inadmissible

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Maa-aineslaki 19 § 2 momentti
AI generated
admin_1987_turku-and-pori-county__713
Administrative court dismissed appeal because building permit decision was not visible for full 14-day appeal period.
insurance_1979_6892-1978
Finnish Insurance Court dismissed late appeal due to failure to notify decision within statutory 30-day period.
admin_1993_uusimaa-county__947
Administrative court dismissed appeal as filed late due to statutory time limit rules.
admin_2014_aland__83
Administrative court rules appeal period did not start due to defective public notice of building permit.
kho-precedent_2009_17
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal by municipality member because minutes were not publicly accessible during business hours.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Oikeuskysymyksenä oli maa-aineslain 19 §:n 2 momentissa

säädetyn ilmoitusvelvollisuuden merkitys valitusajan alkamiselle.

P:n kunnanhallitus oli laiminlyönyt em. lainkohdassa säädetyn

ilmoitusvelvollisuuden maa-aineslupaa koskevassa asiassa,

vaikka valittaja A oli pyytänyt ilmoittamaan luvan myöntämisestä.

A:n valitus, joka oli myöhässä laskettuna päätöksen 17.3.1998

tapahtuneesta julkipanosta jätettiin tutkimatta eikä ilmoitusvelvollisuuden

laiminlyönnillä ollut asiassa merkitystä.