Uudenmaan LO 25.11.1997 821/7
AI generated
Parking sign area not cut by crossing street; traffic sign regulation upheld.
Finland (FI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's claim that a crossing street invalidated a parking prohibition sign. The applicant argued the street cut the sign's effective area, but the court found no evidence of obstruction or confusion. Consequently, the court ruled that the sign remained legally valid and enforceable.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedTieliikenneA 16 §; TieliikenneA 16 § 372 merkki: A crossing street does not automatically invalidate a parking prohibition sign unless it creates confusion or obstruction for drivers.
Keywords
AI generated
parking prohibition sign
crossing street
effective area
traffic sign regulation
administrative court
driver confusion
sign validity
Cited Legislation
AI generatedTieliikenneA 16 §
TieliikenneA 16 § merkki 372
TieliikenneA 16 § 372 merkki
Related Decisions
AI generatedadmin_1989_uusimaa-county__1742
Parking ban sign does not apply to pedestrian crossing street as traffic zone is limited.
admin_2016_helsinki__357
Parking on a side street without a designated sign is illegal despite painted markings alone.
admin_1997_hame-county__715
Parking fine dismissed because vehicle was not within the prohibited parking zone defined by the sign.
admin_1992_turku-and-pori-county__571
Parking fine dismissed because vehicle was parked on green area not intended for cars.
kho-other_2017_6320
Supreme Administrative Court sets aside lower court's court fee order due to disproportionate cost compared to appeal value.
Full text
Risteävä pihakatu ei katkaissut pysäköinti kielletty
-liikennemerkin vaikutusaluetta.
TieliikenneA 16 § merkki 372