Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Uudenmaan LO 18.7.1997 791/6 AI generated

Accrued accident pension interest taxed as income rather than capital gains due to lack of investment basis.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 18.7.1997 791/6
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court ruled that accrued pension interest must be taxed as income, not capital gains. The taxpayer argued the interest represented a return on invested capital, but the court found no underlying investment basis for the pension fund. Consequently, the court upheld the tax authority's classification of the accrued amounts as taxable income.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

TVL 32 §; TVL 33 §; TVL 61 §: Accrued interest on accident pensions is taxable as income when no investment basis exists, rather than as capital gains.

Keywords

AI generated
accident pension interest tax classification income capital gains exclusion investment basis requirement pension fund accrual

Cited Legislation

AI generated
TVL 32 §
TVL 32 § TVL 33 § TVL 61 §
TVL 33 §
TVL 32 § TVL 33 § TVL 61 §
TVL 61 §
TVL 32 § TVL 33 § TVL 61 §
AI generated
admin_2016_turku__683
Administrative court reduced tax penalty to 800 euros despite 1500 euro claim due to statutory cap and procedural fairness.
kho-precedent_2017_183
Supreme Administrative Court allows refund of penalty interest when underlying transfer tax is void due to failed property transfer.
kko-other_1996_3723
Supreme Court dismisses claim for rent increases as they violate the Indexation Act and are void.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2021:28
Court ruled Finnish tax on delayed pension increase valid under Nordic tax treaty.
admin_1993_kuopio-county__448
Court allows full interest refund on reduced tax installment due to retroactive tax adjustment.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

X:lle oli maksettu takautuvasti tapaturmavakuutuslain

(608/48) mukaista eläkettä ja päivärahaa, joita oli mainitun

lain 60 a §:n mukaisesti korotettu suoritusten viivästymisen

johdosta. X vaati korvausten korotusosien verottamista

pääomatulona. Korotusten ei katsottu olevan korkoa

tai muuta siihen rinnastettavaa hyvitystä sijoitetulle

pääomalle, minkä vuoksi korvaukset katsottiin myös korotusosien

osalta ansiotuloksi. Verovuosi 1994.

TVL 32 § TVL 33 § TVL 61 §

KHO:n päätös A:5.3.1999 T:379 : Muutettu