Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Uudenmaan LO 16.1.1997 16/2 AI generated

Student loan not counted as available income for summer 1996 maintenance needs.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 16.1.1997 16/2
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court allowed the student's claim for summer 1996 maintenance support. The student had not yet drawn down an available portion of their student loan, which the County Administrative Board incorrectly treated as unavailable income. The court ruled that the loan could not be legally counted as existing resources for that specific period.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Sosiaalihuoltolaki 30 §; Sosiaalihuoltolaki 32 §: A student loan that has not yet been drawn down by the applicant cannot be counted as available income for calculating maintenance needs in the period prior to the drawdown.

Keywords

AI generated
student loan maintenance support available income summer employment financial resources

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Sosiaalihuoltolaki 30 §
Sosiaalihuoltolaki 32 §
VnP toimeentulotuen yleisistä perusteista (988/93)
VnP toimeentulotuen yleisistä perusteista (988/93)
AI generated
admin_1993_uusimaa-county__99
Student denied social assistance due to existing student grant and lack of student loan.
admin_1996_northern-karelia-county__211
Social assistance court allowed student loan arrears to be deducted from means-tested support.
admin_1995_northern-karelia-county__378
Social assistance court allows student basic support below government decree amount due to discretionary nature.
insurance_2019_2557-2018
Student tuition court dismissed appeal; study start date is first semester start, not registration date.
admin_1997_uusimaa-county__296
Social assistance denied when applicant fails to secure funding primarily through other means before enrolling in private school.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Opiskelijalle oli myönnetty opintotukena opintoraha, asumislisä

ja opintolainan valtiontakaus ajalle 1.9.1995 -

31.5.1996. Hän rahoitti opintojaan ja opiskelun aikaisia

elantomenojaan opintolainan sijasta osittain palkkatuloilla.

Kesäksi opiskelija ei saanut työtä eikä hän harjoittanut

kesäopintojakaan. Lääninoikeus katsoi, että opiskelijan

ei voitu kesäkuun 1996 elantomenojensa rahoittamiseksi

edellyttää nostavan vielä nostamatta olevaa opintolainan

osaa, vaikka opintolaina oli nostettavissa. Opintolainaa ei

voitu lukea opiskelijan kesäkuussa 1996 käytettävissä olevaksi

tuloksi.

SosiaalihuoltoL 30 §

SosiaalihuoltoL 32 §

VnP toimeentulotuen yleisistä perusteista (988/93)