Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Keski-Suomen LO 20.11.1996 652 AI generated

Prisoner denied food security support due to lack of expenses and unwillingness to work in prison.

Case Number Keski-Suomen LO 20.11.1996 652
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the prisoner's claim for food security support because he failed to prove necessary expenses under the relevant government decision. Although the prison authority is obligated to provide basic sustenance, the court found the applicant ineligible due to his refusal to work and lack of documented expenditures. Consequently, the court ruled that no support could be granted without meeting the specific financial criteria.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Sosiaalihuoltolaki 30 § 1 mom; Vankeinhoitolaki 9, 12, 13, 15, 32, 33, 40 §: A prisoner is entitled to food security support only if they can demonstrate necessary expenses defined in the government decision, and the obligation to provide sustenance does not override the requirement to prove financial need through work or documented costs.

Keywords

AI generated
prisoner food security support prison work obligation government decision expenses administrative court dismissal sustenance provision rules

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Sosiaalihuoltolaki 30 § 1 mom
Vankeinhoitolaki 9 §
Vankeinhoitolaki 12 §
Vankeinhoitolaki 13 §
Vankeinhoitolaki 15 §
Vankeinhoitolaki 32 §
Vankeinhoitolaki 33 §
Vankeinhoitolaki 40 §

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Keski-Suomen Lääninoikeus 18.8.1988 T:914
AI generated
admin_1988_central-finland-county__914
Administrative court dismissed prisoner's claim for income support for sports equipment due to existing prison wages.
kho-precedent_2013_58
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses prisoner's appeal for food allowance exceeding standard prison budget limits.
admin_1990_hame-county__890
Administrative court allows social security board to provide living expenses for a detainee lacking income or savings.
admin_2016_hameenlinna__106
Administrative court dismisses prisoner's request for legal aid and private lawyer due to case simplicity.
kko-precedent_2016_53
Supreme Court dismisses discrimination claim where prison director did not renew deputy role due to unproven relationship with former inmate.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rangaistusvangin oikeus saada toimeentulotukea käyttövaroihin.

Rangaistusvanki pyysi toimeentulotukea, koska hänellä ei ollut vankilassa työtuloja eikä muitakaan tuloja. Sosiaalilautakunnan ilmoituksen mukaan tuen hakija ei ole ollut halukas tekemään vankilassa työtä saadakseen käyttövaroja.

Lääninoikeus totesi, että vankeinhoitolaitos on velvollinen antamaan vangille tarpeen mukaisen toimeentulon. Tuen hakija ei ollut osoittanut hänellä olleen toimeentulotuen yleisistä perusteista annetun valtioneuvoston päätöksen 4 §:ssä tarkoitettuja menoja, joten hänellä ei ollut oikeutta saada toimeentulotukea.

Vrt. K-SLO:n päätös 18.8.1988 T:914

SosiaalihuoltoL 30 § 1 mom

VankeinhoitoA 9 §

VankeinhoitoA 12 §

VankeinhoitoA 13 §

VankeinhoitoA 15 §

VankeinhoitoA 32 §

VankeinhoitoA 33 §

VankeinhoitoA 40 §