Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vesiylioikeus 31.3.1995 58/1995 AI generated

Costs of preventive measures cannot be considered when assessing water law permit conditions.

Case Number Vesiylioikeus 31.3.1995 58/1995
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's appeal regarding the refusal of a water usage permit. The court held that costs incurred from preventive measures designed to avoid damages or disadvantages are irrelevant when evaluating the permit conditions under the Water Act. Consequently, the lower court's decision to deny the permit based on these criteria was upheld.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Water Act Chapter 2 Section 6(2); Chapter 3 Section 3(2); Costs of preventive measures to avoid damages or disadvantages cannot be taken into account when assessing the conditions for granting a permit.

Keywords

AI generated
Water Act permit conditions preventive measures costs damages avoidance measures administrative licensing criteria costs exclusion principle

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Water Act Chapter 2 Section 6(2)
Water Act Chapter 3 Section 3(2)
Water Act Chapter 2 Section 11(2)

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KHO decision T:5387, A:31.5.1995
AI generated
admin_1989_water-superior__181
Landowner's claim for sewage tank costs rejected due to groundwater protection zone restrictions under Water Act.
kho-other_2023_2451
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal, upholding ELY Centre's order to protect dormouse habitats despite procedural irregularities.
admin_1990_water-superior__171
Administrative court dismissed appeal against water authority's permit for fish hatchery drainage ditch and dam construction.
kho-other_2014_3344
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal regarding compensation for waterway construction affecting property value and landscape. Appeal rejected due to lack of grounds to alter lower court decision. Court upheld original compensation calculation and denied legal costs. Appeal dismissed. Appeal rejected due to lack of grounds to alter lower court decision. Court upheld original compensation calculation and denied legal costs.
kho-other_2014_957
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against environmental permit for peat production, upholding lower court's decision on damages and fees.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Vahinkojen, haittojen ja edunmenetysten kokonaan ehkäisevistä

toimenpiteistä aiheutuvia kustannuksia ei voida ottaa huomioon

arvioitaessa vesilain 2 luvun 6 §:n 2 momentin ja 3 luvun 3

§:n 2 momentin mukaisia luvan myöntämisen edellytyksiä.

VesiL 2 luku 11 § 2 mom

KHO:n päätös T:5387, A:31.5.1995: ei valituslupaa