Administrative court dismissed claim that water authority must wait for building permit exception before deciding on bridge construction.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's claim that the water authority lacked jurisdiction to rule on bridge construction until a building permit exception was granted. The applicant argued the water authority's independent status under the Water Act required it to wait for the planning authority's decision. The court held that the water authority could independently assess the construction permit application without prior approval of a building permit exception.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedVesiL 14 luku 1 § 1 mom; The water authority possesses independent jurisdiction to decide on construction permits for water bodies without requiring a prior building permit exception from the planning authority.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
VYO hylkäsi B:n väitteen siitä, että VEO ei ollut voinut ottaa
A:n sillan ja penkereen rakentamista vesistöön koskevaa lupa-asiaa
ratkaistavakseen ennen kuin vahvistetusta rantakaavasta
on myönnetty rakennuslainsäädännön mukainen poikkeuslupa, koska
VEO:lla on itsenäinen asema vesilain mukaista rakentamislupa-asiaa
ratkaistessaan.
VesiL 14 luku 1 § 1 mom
KHO:n päätös T:1579, A:22.5.1996: Ei valituslupaa