Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vesiylioikeus 10.10.1995 157/1995 AI generated

Withdrawal of fishing license application by applicant leads to dismissal of appeal and termination of proceedings.

Case Number Vesiylioikeus 10.10.1995 157/1995
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the appeal against the Water Authority's decision to withdraw the applicant's fishing license application. The applicant had voluntarily withdrawn the request for a license to cultivate fish in a leased natural lake and discharge water into the sea, arguing no interest required a ruling. Consequently, the court revoked the Water Authority's decision and terminated the proceedings, though the appellant retained the right to claim legal costs from the applicant.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

VesiL 16 luku 22 §; OK 21 luku 7 § 2 mom: When an applicant withdraws a license application, the authority may revoke its own decision to rule on it, and the proceedings terminate, leaving the applicant liable for the appellant's legal costs.

Keywords

AI generated
fishing license withdrawal administrative appeal dismissal procedural termination legal costs liability water authority decision voluntary application withdrawal no interest ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
VesiL 16 luku 22 §
OK 21 luku 7 § 2 mom
VesiL 15 luku 23 §
AI generated
kko-other_2020_1664
Supreme Court dismisses appeal and remands case regarding refusal of asylum seeker's appeal against deportation order.
kko-other_2020_1661
Supreme Court dismissed appeal, quashing lower court rulings and remitting case for further proceedings.
kko-other_2020_1662
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against lower courts' rulings on asylum rejection and revocation of residence permit.
kho-other_2014_3904
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal, ruling separate water and building permit conditions must be evaluated together by the authority.
admin_2026_vaasa__133
Administrative court dismissed appeal against water law enforcement order for over 20 hectares of ditching.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Hakija oli valituksiin antamassaan vastineessa peruuttanut

lupahakemuksensa, joka koski kalan kasvattamista tarkoitukseen

vuokratussa luonnonravintolammikossa ja veden johtamista lammikosta

mereen. Koska mitkään intressit eivät vaatineet lupakysymyksen

ratkaisemista, VYO kumosi ja poisti VEO:n päätöksen

ja totesi, että lausunnon antaminen hakemuksesta, muistutuksista

ja valituksista raukesi. Valittajilla oli kuitenkin oikeus

saada luvan hakijalta korvaus muutoksenhakukuluistaan.

VesiL 15 luku 23 §

OK 21 luku 7 § 2 mom

Ks. VesiL 16 luku 22 §

Lainvoimainen