Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Mikkelin LO 2.6.1995 477 AI generated

Administrative court dismisses appeal on free trial request while upholding custody restriction order.

Case Number Mikkelin LO 2.6.1995 477
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The administrative court dismissed the applicant's request for free legal proceedings while the custody restriction order remained in effect. Although the main custody case was decided separately and not appealable to the Supreme Administrative Court under the Child Welfare Act, the county court allowed an appeal regarding the denial of free trial. The court ruled that the statutory provisions governing free trial apply independently to this procedural request, leading to the dismissal of the appeal on that specific ground.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Laki maksuttomasta oikeudenkäynnistä 1 § 1 mom 4 kohta; 23 § ja 24 §: The denial of free legal proceedings constitutes a separate appealable decision even when the substantive custody order is not appealable to the Supreme Administrative Court.

Keywords

AI generated
free legal proceedings administrative appeal child welfare act custody restriction procedural rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Laki maksuttomasta oikeudenkäynnistä 1 § 1 mom 4 kohta
Laki maksuttomasta oikeudenkäynnistä 1 § 1 mom 4 kohta,
Laki maksuttomasta oikeudenkäynnistä 23 §
Laki maksuttomasta oikeudenkäynnistä 24 §
lastensuojelulain 37 § 2 momentti

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KHO 9.9.1994 T:4079
AI generated
ECLI:FI:KHO:2024:86
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal because child protection decision limiting contact rights was not served to mother evidentially.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2017:188
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal; established legal aid practice for minors with guardian representation stands.
kko-precedent_1997_64
Supreme Court held child custody cases do not allow cost shifting unless specific reasons exist, unlike alimony disputes.
kho-precedent_2004_56
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses legal aid office's appeal as it lacks standing under administrative procedure law.
kko-other_2019_233
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding refusal of further proceedings permission for a minor's guardian ad litem.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asiassa, jossa oli kyse yhteydenpidon rajoittamisesta

huostaanotetun ja sijaishuoltoon sijoitetun lapsen ja hänen

vanhempiensa välillä, on samalla päätöksellä hylätty hakemus

maksuttoman oikeudenkäynnin saamisesta. Huostaanotosta

oli päätetty erikseen. Vaikka pääasiasta ei saa valittaa

korkeimpaan hallinto-oikeuteen lastensuojelulain 37 §:n

2 momentin perusteella, lääninoikeus antoi asiassa valitusosoituksen

siltä osin kuin hakemus maksuttoman oikeudenkäynnin

myöntämisestä oli hylätty.

Laki maksuttomasta oikeudenkäynnistä 1 § 1 mom 4 kohta,

23 § ja 24 §

Ks. KHO 9.9.1994 T:4079