Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Hämeen LO 17.8.1995 713/2 AI generated

Pre-construction permit decision not subject to mandatory reasoning under Administrative Procedure Act s. 24(2) as it does not affect another party.

Case Number Hämeen LO 17.8.1995 713/2
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the appeal against the building committee's decision to grant a pre-construction permit. The appellant argued that the decision required mandatory reasoning under the Administrative Procedure Act, but the court found no such obligation. The court held that because the pre-construction permit does not legally affect the neighboring property owner in the manner defined by s. 24(2), the decision did not need to be reasoned.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Administrative Procedure Act s. 24(1); s. 24(2): A decision granting a pre-construction permit is not considered to affect another party within the meaning of s. 24(2) and therefore does not require mandatory reasoning.

Keywords

AI generated
pre-construction permit mandatory reasoning administrative procedure act affected party building committee decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Administrative Procedure Act s. 24(1)
Administrative Procedure Act s. 24(2)

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KHO 6.3.1996 taltionumero 626
AI generated
kko-precedent_1989_30
Supreme Court dismisses buyer's claim to rescind land sale due to seller's warranty about building permit when buyer failed to verify zoning rules.
admin_1986_aland-county__20
Administrative court dismisses appeal as building permit cannot be enforced until exception permit is final.
admin_1989_aland-county__125
Administrative court dismissed building inspector's claim to designate a site violating building law distance rules.
admin_1988_water-superior__140
Administrative court dismissed water authority's permit due to missing mandatory groundwater impact studies.
kho-precedent_2003_63
Neighbor's appeal dismissed; storage building exempt from permit under new zoning rules despite proximity.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ympäristölautakunnan rakennusjaosto oli myöntänyt rakennusluvan saunarakennuksen rakentamiseen. Rakennuspaikan viereisen kiinteistön omistaja oli valittanut rakennusjaoston päätöksestä. Rakennusjaosto on tämän jälkeen rakennuttajan hakemuksesta myöntänyt viimeksi mainitulle rakennusasetuksen 149 §:n mukaisen luvan saada aloittaa rakennustyö ennen kuin rakennuslupa on saavuttanut lainvoiman. Tällaisen ennakkoaloituslupahakemuksen hyväksymisen sisältävän päätöksen perusteleminen on ollut tarpeetonta, koska tällainen päätös ei koske hallintomenettelylain 24 §:n 2 momentissa tarkoitetulla tavalla toista asianosaista.

Hallintomenettelylaki 24 § 1 mom

KHO:n päätös 6.3.1996 taltionumero 626. Ei muutosta.