Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vaasan LO 28.7.1994 492/III AI generated

Court dismisses temporary driving ban for single weed detector violation under Finnish Traffic Act.

Case Number Vaasan LO 28.7.1994 492/III
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Vaasa dismissed the County Administrative Court's decision to revoke a temporary driving ban imposed for a single weed detector violation. The lower court found that the statutory requirements for such a ban were not met because the driver had not committed other offenses under the relevant section of the Traffic Act within the year. Consequently, the court ruled that the administrative authority lacked the legal basis to impose the restriction.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Tieliikennelaki 75 § 2 momentin 5 kohta; A temporary driving ban may only be imposed if the driver has committed multiple offenses or specific serious acts under the Traffic Act within the relevant period, which was not the case here.

Keywords

AI generated
temporary driving ban weed detector violation Traffic Act 75 administrative discretion single offense restriction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Tieliikennelaki 75 § 2 mom 5 kohta
Tieliikennelaki 75 § 2 mom 5 kohta

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KHO:n päätös T:440, A:17.2.1995
KHO:n päätös T:440, A:17.2.1995: Ei muutosta.
AI generated
admin_1992_hame-county__700
Court dismissed driver's license suspension appeal, ruling two-year ban insufficient to prove lost driving skills.
admin_1992_northern-karelia-county__341
Court dismisses mandatory new driver test for single minor traffic offense under Finnish Transport Law.
admin_1987_central-finland-county__290
Administrative court revoked driver's license suspension due to failure to meet three-offense threshold within one year.
market_2022_H394
Market Court dismisses appeal; trademark registration validity assessed at initial registration date, not current user status.
kho-precedent_2014_95
Court rejects ne bis in idem claim, allowing administrative driving ban despite prior criminal fines.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Oikeuskysymyksenä asiassa oli, voidaanko ajo-oikeuden haltija

määrätä määräaikaiseen ajokieltoon, kun tämä oli syyllistynyt

vuoden kuluessa ainoastaan yhteen tutkanpaljastinrikkomukseen.

A oli syyllistynyt 13.5.1994 tutkanpaljastinrikkomukseen.

Nimismies määräsi A:n ajokieltoon 1.8.-14.8.1994 väliseksi

ajaksi.

Lääninoikeus kumosi nimismiehen päätöksen ja katsoi, että

edellytyksiä määräaikaisen ajokiellon määräämiselle ei ollut,

koska A ei ollut vuoden sisällä muutoin syyllistynyt mainittuun

rikkomukseen tai muuhun tieliikennelain 75 §:n 2 momentin

5 kohdassa tarkoitettuun tekoon.

Tieliikennelaki 75 § 2 mom 5 kohta

KHO:n päätös T:440, A:17.2.1995: Ei muutosta.