Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Uudenmaan LO 10.3.1994 275/1 AI generated

Construction permit denied for fuel station on land designated for commercial buildings without exception.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 10.3.1994 275/1
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Uusimaa denied a construction permit for a fuel station on land zoned for commercial buildings. The applicant argued the facility was necessary for business operations, but the court found it violated the zoning plan's designated purpose. Consequently, the court ruled that a permit could only be granted with an exception, which was not provided.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

RakennusA 50 § 1 mom 6 kohta; RakennusA 53 § 1 mom: A construction permit for a facility inconsistent with the zoning plan's designated purpose cannot be granted unless an exception is issued.

Keywords

AI generated
zoning plan violation construction permit denial fuel station location commercial building zone exception permit requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
RakennusA 50 § 1 mom 6 kohta
RakennusA 50 § 1 mom 6 kohta
RakennusA 53 § 1 mom

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Mikkelin LO A:17.2.1993 T:133
Toisin Mikkelin LO A:17.2.1993 T:133
AI generated
kho-precedent_1997_24
Construction permit granted for fuel station on industrial zone land did not violate zoning plan.
kho-precedent_2008_14
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal; general plan does not cause unreasonable harm if detailed plan is feasible.
admin_2007_helsinki__1820
Planning authority decision revoked for violating planning act and causing unequal treatment of landowners.
kko-precedent_1993_29
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; existing zoning plan binding for acquisition without new subdivision approval.
admin_2015_hameenlinna__595
Inheritance tax exemption denied for coastal plots deemed non-agricultural due to prior sales and building rights.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asemakaavassa liike- ja toimistorakennusten korttelialueeksi

osoitetulle tontille rakennettavaksi suunniteltu miehittämätön

polttonesteautomaattiasema käsitti kolme polttonestepumppua

ja maksuautomaatin sekä katoksen. Tällaisen

polttonesteautomaattiaseman sijoittaminen tontille merkitsi

tontin käyttämistä huoltoasematoiminnan harjoittamiseen ja

oli siten tontin asemakaavassa osoitetun käyttötarkoituksen

vastaista. Toimenpidelupaa ei ollut myönnettävä ilman poikkeuslupaa.

Äänestys 2-1.

Toisin Mikkelin LO A:17.2.1993 T:133

RakennusA 50 § 1 mom 6 kohta

RakennusA 53 § 1 mom

KHO:n päätös A:24.1.1995 T:199 : Ei muutosta. Päätös on

tallennettu oikeustapausrekisteriin (FKHO)