Vesiylioikeus 22.12.1993 262/1993
AI generated
Administrative court dismissed claims where prosecution statute of limitations expired for unauthorized administrative acts.
Finland (FI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Administrative Court dismissed the plaintiffs' requests for compensation and rehabilitation regarding an unauthorized administrative act. The plaintiffs argued for redress, but the court found the criminal prosecution statute of limitations had expired. Consequently, the court ruled that the claims were inadmissible due to the passage of time.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedOK 14 luku 11 §; The criminal prosecution statute of limitations bars claims for compensation when the period has expired without prosecution.
Keywords
AI generated
statute of limitations
criminal prosecution
unauthorized act
administrative compensation
rehabilitation claims
procedural bar
expired limitation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedOK 14 luku 11 §
Related Decisions
AI generatedkko-precedent_1998_161
Supreme Court allows damages claim after retrial when prior judgment did not address compensation rights.
kko-other_1995_2055
Supreme Court allows state to recover costs from criminal defendant despite prior partial cost order.
kko-precedent_1996_26
Supreme Court allows civil claims in criminal trial even if defendant absent personally but represented by counsel.
kko-other_2006_720
Supreme Court dismissed client's claim for increased damages due to changed trial circumstances without prior appeal.
kko-precedent_1987_123
Supreme Court allows criminal case damages claim when legal basis differs from prior civil judgment.
Full text
Rikosasiassa asianomistajien korvaus- ja ennallistamisvaatimukset
tutkittiin myös siltä osin kuin niiden perusteena olevan
luvattoman toimenpiteen syyteoikeus oli vanhentunut.
OK 14 luku 11 §
Lainvoimainen