Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vesiylioikeus 10.9.1993 156/1993 AI generated

Administrative court dismisses fish farm's claim that water authority must compensate for past damages.

Case Number Vesiylioikeus 10.9.1993 156/1993
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the fish farm's application to compel the water authority to compensate for damages caused by earlier permits. The applicant argued that the water authority had a legal duty to address such issues, but the court found no such obligation existed. Consequently, the court removed the water authority's decision requiring the applicant to initiate compensation proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

VesiL 11 luku 8 § 3 mom; VesiL 16 luku 21 §: The water authority lacks statutory authority to compel a permit applicant to initiate compensation proceedings for damages arising from previous permits when the current decision does not address such issues.

Keywords

AI generated
water authority compensation proceedings previous permits statutory duty fish farming administrative court damages claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
VesiL 11 luku 8 § 3 mom
VesiL 16 luku 21 §

Cited Case Law

AI generated
VYO:n päätös T:135/1993, A:1.7.1993
VYO:n päätös T:135/1993, A:1.7.1993
AI generated
ECLI:FI:KHO:2024:117
Military service pay denied for early resignation; court upholds employer's refusal based on statutory purpose.
admin_1994_water-superior__20
Administrative court dismissed late appeal for compensation due to procedural time limits and lack of prior notice.
kko-other_1998_3045
Supreme Court dismissed state's duty to pay legal costs in a salary security case.
insurance_2011_1562-2011
Insurance court dismissed request to annul non-final social security board decision due to pending appeal period.
insurance_1998_10509-1996
Insurance court reversed state office's dismissal of post-hearing medical costs and lost wages.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kun kalanviljelylaitoksen jätevesiluvissa ei ollut määrätty

korvauskysymyksiä ratkaistavaksi osaksikaan myöhemmin eikä

vesioikeudelle ollut vesilain 11 luvun 8 §:n 3 momentin mukaisesti

esitetty aikaisempiin lupiin perustuvia, luvissa edellyttämättömiä

vahinkoja koskevia korvausvaatimuksia, vesioikeudella

ei, hylätessään laitoksen jatkolupahakemuksen, ollut

lakiin perustuvaa oikeutta viran puolesta velvoittaa luvan

hakijaa panemaan vireille hakemusta aikaisempiin lupiin perustuvien

vahinkojen, haittojen ja edunmenetysten korvaamisesta.

Vesioikeuden päätöksestä poistettiin tätä koskeva määräys.

VesiL 11 luku 8 § 3 mom

VesiL 16 luku 21 §

Vastaava ratkaisu vesilain 11 luvun 8 §:n 2 momentin soveltamisesta

VYO:n päätös T:135/1993, A:1.7.1993

Lainvoimainen