Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vesiylioikeus 29.1.1993 10/1993 AI generated

Administrative court allows compensation claim for water supply obstruction covering pre-ownership period.

Case Number Vesiylioikeus 29.1.1993 10/1993
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court allowed the water authority's compensation claim regarding the obstruction of water supply, ruling that the claim must cover the period before the applicant acquired ownership. The court held that the water law provision and a Supreme Court precedent require compensation for the current owner even for periods prior to their acquisition of title. Consequently, the court immediately examined the portion of the claim relating to the time the land was not owned by the applicant.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Water Act Chapter 1 Section 9 Paragraph 1; Supreme Court Judgment 1990:68: Compensation for obstruction of fixed property use and difficulty in use is due to the current owner even for periods preceding the transfer of ownership rights.

Keywords

AI generated
water supply obstruction compensation claim pre-ownership period ownership transfer fixed property use administrative compensation water law provisions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Water Act Chapter 1 Section 9 Paragraph 1
Supreme Court Judgment 1990:68

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Supreme Court Judgment 1990:68
AI generated
kko-precedent_1990_68
Supreme Court allows claim against third party for unjust enrichment from water damage compensation paid to former owner.
kko-precedent_1993_6
Supreme Court allows compensation for road damage when landowner retains rights after selling land to municipality.
kko-precedent_2000_114
Supreme Court of Finland orders compensation for voluntary co-owner's exclusive use of shared property after relationship breakdown.
appeal_1985_rovaniemi__1525
Good faith recipient not liable for replacement value under restitution law when original owner sues.
admin_1993_water-superior__202
Administrative court dismissed compensation claim for pre-acquisition water damage due to lack of liability transfer.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

VEO oli hakemusasiassa jättänyt tilanomistajan korvausvaatimukset

tilan vedensaannin estymisestä ja vaikeutumisesta tutkimatta

siltä osin, kuin ne koskivat aikaa, jolloin tila ei

ollut hakijan omistuksessa.

VYO katsoi, että oikeus vaatia kiinteän omaisuuden käytön estymisestä

ja vaikeutumisesta korvausta kuului vesilain 1 luvun

9 §:n 1 momentin säännöksen ja korkeimman oikeuden vuosikirjaratkaisusta

1990:68 ilmenevän periaatteen huomioon ottaen tilan

nykyiselle omistajalle myös omistusoikeuden siirtymistä

edeltäneeltä ajalta. VEO:n ei olisi tullut jättää korvausvaatimuksia

tutkimatta siltäkään osin kuin ne koskivat aikaa,

jolloin tila ei ollut hakijan omistuksessa. Tältä osin asia

tutkittiin välittömästi.

VesiL 1 luku 9 § 1 mom

KKO:1990-II-68

Lainvoimainen