Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Uudenmaan LO 19.1.1993 46/2 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed appeal regarding military assistance recovery venue based on municipality location.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 19.1.1993 46/2
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The county court dismissed the applicant's request to recover military assistance, ruling that the dispute falls under the Social Services Act. The court determined the proper venue is the municipality where the applicant resides, not the county court district. Consequently, the county court declined to examine the case as it lacked jurisdiction over the matter.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Sosiaalihuoltolain 1 § 1 kohta; 51 kohta: The proper venue for disputes regarding the recovery of military assistance is the municipality where the applicant resides, not the county court district.

Keywords

AI generated
military assistance recovery social services act venue determination administrative jurisdiction municipal location county court district procedural standing

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Sosiaalihuoltolain 1 § 1 mom
Sosiaalihuoltolain 51 §
AI generated
kko-other_2009_232
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding improper transfer of case to lower court under procedural rules.
admin_2001_helsinki__56
Administrative court jurisdiction determined by primary residence location under Foreigners Act and Administrative Procedure Act.
admin_2021_turku__217
Administrative court dismissed appeal regarding jurisdictional conflict between child protection authorities in different districts.
kko-precedent_1988_117
Supreme Court allows bill suit in nearest city court when geographic distance is shortest.
appeal_1979_eastern-finland__2182
Costs for keeping a child in custody are a court matter, not an administrative one, barring appeal rights.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Oikeuskysymyksenä oli sotilasavustuksen takaisin perimistä

koskevan riidan oikeuspaikka.

Lääninoikeuden tuomiopiirissä sijaitsematon kunta oli vaatinut,

että lääninoikeus velvoittaa henkilön, jonka kotipaikka

oli lääninoikeuden tuomiopiirissä, maksamaan takaisin

perusteettomasti nostamansa sotilasavustuksen.

Lääninoikeus katsoi, että vaatimus sotilasavustuksen maksamisesta

takaisin kunnalle on sellainen sosiaalihuoltoa

koskeva riita-asia, jota tarkoitetaan sosiaalihuoltolain

51 §:ssä. Oikeuspaikka määräytyi siten hakijakunnan mukaan.

Koska hakijakunta ei sijainnut lääninoikeuden tuomiopiirissä,

lääninoikeus jätti hakemuksen tutkimatta.

SosiaalihuoltoL 1 § 1 mom

SosiaalihuoltoL 51 §