Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Uudenmaan LO 2.2.1993 100/1 AI generated

Student denied social assistance due to prior seven years of state study grant eligibility.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 2.2.1993 100/1
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the student's claim for social assistance, ruling that the seven-year state study grant period precluded further eligibility. The court noted the student sought aid due to lack of employment and study funding, but found no special justification for assistance. Consequently, the court held that general social assistance cannot replace study grants without specific grounds.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Sosiaalihuoltolaki 30 §; A student who has received state study grants for seven years is not entitled to social assistance unless special circumstances are demonstrated.

Keywords

AI generated
state study grant social assistance denial seven year limit student eligibility administrative court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Sosiaalihuoltolaki 30 §

Cited Case Law

AI generated
ULOT 101/1, A 2.2.1993
AI generated
admin_1994_uusimaa-county__458
Administrative court dismissed welfare benefit claim because student income is primary source of living expenses.
admin_1993_uusimaa-county__99
Student denied social assistance due to existing student grant and lack of student loan.
kho-precedent_2001_35
Student denied study aid due to poor grades may still qualify for means-tested support if no other primary income exists.
kho-precedent_2005_20
Student's social assistance claim dismissed as income from study support exceeds means-tested benefit threshold.
kho-precedent_2007_69
Supreme Administrative Court allows claimant's appeal, ruling student loan income cannot be counted for welfare benefits due to migrant status and school success.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Korkeakouluopiskelija L ei voinut saada enää valtion

opintotukea, koska hän oli jo saanut opintotukea seitsemän

opintovuotta. L opiskeli myös kesällä, koska hän ei

ollut saanut työtä, ja haki toimeentulotukea opintotuen

ja ansiotulojen puuttumisen vuoksi. Toimeentulotukea ei

ollut myönnettävä, koska opintoja ei voida pääsääntöisesti

rahoittaa toimeentulotuella eikä L ollut esittänyt

erityistä syytä toimeentulotuen saamiseen.

Samoin ULO T:101/1, A:2.2.1993: Toimeentulotukea ei

myönnetty syyskuuksi korkeakouluopiskelijalle, jolla ei

ollut työtuloja eikä oikeutta opintotukeen hänen saatuaan

opintotukea jo seitsemän vuotta.

SosiaalihuoltoL 30 §