Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Mikkelin LO 9.9.1993 680 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed appeal where selection criteria were met but justification omitted from decision.

Case Number Mikkelin LO 9.9.1993 680
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's appeal against a decision to lease city land to a specific family. The technical committee selected the applicant based on their circumstances but failed to explicitly state the selection criteria in the decision. The court ruled that while the justification could be omitted, the selection must still be based on the applicants' circumstances.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

L 139 § 2 mom; HallintomenettelyL 24 § 2 mom 2 kohta: A decision based on selection criteria is valid even if the specific criteria are not explicitly stated in the decision, provided the selection was made on the basis of the applicants' circumstances.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative selection justification omission land lease decision selection criteria procedural fairness technical committee administrative court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
L 139 § 2 mom
HallintomenettelyL 24 § 2 mom 2 kohta
HallintomenettelyL 24 § 2 mom 2 kohta
AI generated
kho-precedent_2010_81
Court dismissed appeal allowing appointment of qualified candidate despite statutory eligibility requirements for the position.
admin_1993_uusimaa-county__947
Administrative court dismissed appeal as filed late due to statutory time limit rules.
kko-other_1998_1730
Supreme Court dismisses appeal as applicant withdrew the complaint, halting further proceedings.
admin_1992_hame-county__398
Administrative court dismissed appeal because city council failed to notify decision to applicant as required by law.
admin_1992_kuopio-county__182
Administrative court dismisses appeal for failure to attach required decision to appeal document.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Oikeuskysymyksenä oli, onko päätös ollut perusteltava, kun

tekninen lautakunta on valinnut useista hakijoista N.N.:n

ja päättänyt vuokrata kaupungin vuokratontin hänelle ja

hänen perheelleen. Valinta oli tehtävä hakijoiden olosuhteiden perusteella. Lääninoikeus katsoi, että perustelu voitiin jättää ilmaisematta.

KunL 139 § 2 mom

HallintomenettelyL 24 § 2 mom 2 kohta