Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vaasan LO 10.4.1992 177/I AI generated

Neighbors cannot appeal building committee decisions regarding power line placement on other properties.

Case Number Vaasan LO 10.4.1992 177/I
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the neighbors' appeal against the building committee's decision to route power lines through adjacent properties. Although the lines were planned to cross the neighbors' land, the committee ruled that the decision only concerned the specific sites designated for the double-circuit lines. The court held that since the neighbors' properties were not the subject of the decision, they lacked standing to challenge it.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Building Act 138 §; Building Act 133 §: Neighbors whose land is merely crossed by a facility do not have standing to appeal a building committee decision if the decision does not concern their specific property rights.

Keywords

AI generated
standing to appeal building committee decision power line routing adjacent property rights procedural standing

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Building Act 138 §
Building Act 133 §
AI generated
kho-precedent_2009_91
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal against administrative board's decision to ignore appeal regarding coastal structure legality.
kho-other_2026_663
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal, dismisses complaint, and orders city to pay Telia's court costs.
admin_2013_aland__94
Administrative court grants appeal rights to neighbors under national law for planning needs areas in Åland.
admin_1999_turku-and-pori-county__191
Administrative court dismisses building committee's authority to order sewage and water pipe placement under Building Act 133 §.
kho-precedent_2002_47
Appeal dismissed; neighbor lacks standing to challenge minor planning exceptions under Finnish Building Act.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Oikeuskysymyksenä asiassa oli, onko naapurikiinteistöjen

omistajilla valitusoikeus rakennuslautakunnan päätöksestä,

jolla rakennuslautakunta oli määrännyt sähköjohtojen sijoittamisesta

rakennuslain 133 §:n nojalla.

Rakennuslautakunta oli määrännyt, että sähköyhtiö saa sijoittaa

kaksoisvoimajohdon eräille tiloille. Muiden ohella rakennuslautakunnan

päätöksestä valittivat naapurikiinteistöjen

omistajat, joiden kiinteistöjen kautta voimajohtolinja oli

myös suunniteltu kulkevaksi, mutta joiden kiinteistöjen käyttämistä

voimajohdon sijoittamiseen rakennuslautakunnan päätös

ei koskenut.

Lääninoikeus katsoi, ettei naapurikiinteistöjen omistajilla

ollut oikeutta valittaa rakennuslautakunnan päätöksestä, ja

jätti heidän valituksensa tutkimatta.

RakennusL_138_§