Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Uudenmaan LO 10.9.1992 959/1 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed appeal because Red Cross employee, not authority, made the social assistance decision.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 10.9.1992 959/1
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The administrative court dismissed the applicant's appeal against a social assistance decision made by a Finnish Red Cross employee. The applicant argued the decision required review by the county court, but the court found the employee lacked the authority to make a legally reviewable administrative decision. Consequently, the decision was not subject to administrative court jurisdiction under the relevant statutes.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

HValL 2 §; HValL 3 §: An administrative court lacks jurisdiction to review a decision made by a non-authority entity, such as a Red Cross employee, as only a competent administrative authority can create a decision subject to administrative review.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative jurisdiction social assistance decision competent authority administrative review Finnish Red Cross appeal dismissal decision validity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
HValL 2 §
HValL 3 §
LOL 2 §
AI generated
admin_1992_turku-and-pori-county__1203
Administrative court dismissed appeal against social aid decision made by Red Cross, ruling it non-appealable.
kho-precedent_1998_79
Appeal dismissed because planning criteria approval is not a final decision subject to administrative review.
admin_1992_kuopio-county__182
Administrative court dismisses appeal for failure to attach required decision to appeal document.
admin_2015_turku__61
Administrative court dismisses appeal due to lack of jurisdiction over labor disputes and standing of union representative.
admin_1993_uusimaa-county__947
Administrative court dismissed appeal as filed late due to statutory time limit rules.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Suomen Punaisn Ristin työntekijä oli myöntänyt turvapaikanhakijalle

pakolaisten toimeentulon turvaamisesta annetun

valtioneuvoston päätöksen (537/88) 3 §:n mukaista toimeentulotukea.

Lääninoikeus ei tutkinut turvapaikanhakijan

mainitusta päätöksestä tekemää valitusta, koska päätöstä,

josta valitettiin, ei ollut tehnyt hallintoviranomainen,

vaan Suomen Punaisen Ristin työntekijä. Päätöksestä ei

voinut valittaa lääninoikeuteen.

HValL 2 §

HValL 3 §

LOL 2 §