Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Uudenmaan LO 27.8.1992 891/1 AI generated

Social assistance benefit reduced because child's debt repayment from pension was considered available income.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 27.8.1992 891/1
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's request to increase her social assistance allowance. The court found that the applicant's pension was legally used to repay her son's bank debt, leaving only the remaining portion as available income for benefit calculation. Consequently, the reduction in her allowance was upheld as the correct application of the social assistance act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Sosiaalihuoltolaki 30 §; Sosiaalihuoltolaki 32 §: The court held that income derived from the repayment of a third party's debt using pension funds constitutes available income for social assistance benefit calculations.

Keywords

AI generated
social assistance benefit available income calculation pension fund usage third party debt administrative court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Sosiaalihuoltolaki 30 §
Sosiaalihuoltolaki 32 §
VNp toimeentulotuen yleisistä perusteista (1349/88)
VNp toimeentulotuen yleisistä perusteista (1349/88)
AI generated
admin_2007_oulu__414
Court allows care fee when net income exceeds 80 euros, excluding pension deductions from income calculation.
appeal_1979_eastern-finland__901
Social Security Board limited child support payment to arrears only under specific statutory conditions.
kko-precedent_1999_66
Supreme Court rules both children must be considered for protected deduction despite wife's higher income.
admin_1991_northern-karelia-county__553
Court allows partial reduction of nursing home fees by considering personal expenses and transport costs.
kko-precedent_2011_15
Supreme Court allows unpaid employee's request for vacation months in fictitious salary enforcement case.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A oli joutunut takaajana maksamaan pankille poikansa tontin

ostoa varten saaman 50 000 markan lainan, jonka poika oli

käyttänyt muuhun tarkoitukseen. Velkaa ulosmitattiin A:n

3 626 markan suuruisesta eläkkeestä 697,15 markkaa kuukaudessa.

A:n toimeentulotukea määrättäessä oli hänen käytettävissä

olevina tuloinaan näissä oloissa otettava huomioon

ulosmittauksen jälkeen käytettäväksi jäävät eläketulot.

SosiaalihuoltoL 30 §

SosiaalihuoltoL 32 §

VNp toimeentulotuen yleisistä perusteista (1349/88)