Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Uudenmaan LO 23.4.1992 530/2 AI generated

Childcare not required during maternity pay period for second child under Finnish law.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 23.4.1992 530/2
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court ruled that the municipality was not obligated to provide childcare for a child under three years old during the period the mother received maternity benefits for a second child. The municipality argued for a continuous childcare obligation, but the court found the statutory provision allowing maternity pay for a second child implicitly exempted the mother from the childcare requirement. Consequently, the court held that the municipality's duty to arrange childcare did not extend to this specific time frame.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Lapsen päivähoidosta 11 a §; Lapsen päivähoidosta 2 §: During the period when a mother is entitled to maternity benefits for a second child, the municipality is not obligated to arrange childcare for her child under three years of age.

Keywords

AI generated
childcare obligation maternity benefits second child municipal duty Finnish law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Lapsen päivähoidosta 11 a §
Lapsen päivähoidosta 2 §
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kunta ei ollut velvollinen järjestämään alle kolmivuotiaalle

lapselle päivähoitopaikkaa aikana, jona lapsen

äidille voitiin suorittaa äitiysrahaa toisen lapsen

syntymän johdosta.

L lasten päivähoidosta 11 a §

A lasten päivähoidosta 2 §