Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Uudenmaan LO 27.11.1992 1588/5 AI generated

Court ruled interest payments on early debt repayment are taxable income, not a price reduction.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 27.11.1992 1588/5
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court ruled that interest payments made by a company to a buyer for early debt repayment constitute taxable income. While the majority held the interest was a separate taxable event, a minority argued it represented a reduction in the purchase price. The court ultimately decided the interest was taxable income under the relevant tax provisions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

TVL 19 §; The interest paid by a seller to a buyer for early repayment of a purchase price constitutes taxable income rather than a reduction of the purchase price.

Keywords

AI generated
taxable income early repayment interest payments purchase price reduction taxable event administrative court financial compensation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
TVL 19 §

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KHO:n päätös T:823 A:10.3.1994
KHO:n päätös T:823 A:10.3.1994 : KHO toisin, päätös tallennettu
AI generated
ECLI:FI:KHO:2020:154
Voluntary electricity outage discounts are deductible VAT adjustments even without statutory obligation.
admin_1989_central-finland-county__509
Court allows loan interest deduction for share purchase enabling employment as business-related debt interest.
admin_1999_uusimaa-county__598
Administrative court dismissed tax refund claim where dividend distribution was deemed concealed rather than real.
admin_2016_vaasa__298
Administrative court ruled that spousal compensation in a farm dissolution is fully tax-free income under Finnish law.
admin_1996_hame-county__612
Court denies mortgage interest deduction for vacation home sale profit as it is not a prior loan cost.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A oli ostanut rakennusliike X Oy:ltä RS 4 kauppakirjalla

asuinhuoneiston hallintaan oikeuttavat osakkeet. Kauppakirjassa

oli sovittu kauppahinta, kauppahinnan maksuerien

suuruus ja suoritusajat. Kauppakirjan mukaan ostajalla oli

oikeus saada 10 prosentin vuotuinen hyvityskorko maksupäivän

ja eräpäivän väliseltä ajalta, jos maksuerä suoritettiin

ennen sen erääntymistä.

Lääninoikeus katsoi, että X Oy:n maksama hyvityskorko oli

A:n veronalaista tuloa. Verovuosi 1988. Äänestys 2-1.

Eri mieltä ollut jäsen ja esittelijä katsoivat, että X

Oy:n A:lle suorittama korkohyvitys oli kauppahinnan alennusta

eikä veronalaista tuloa.

TVL 19 §

KHO:n päätös T:823 A:10.3.1994 : KHO toisin, päätös tallennettu

oikeustapausrekisteriin (FKHO)