Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Uudenmaan LO 25.9.1992 1342/2 AI generated

Administrative court dismisses election board's rejection due to failure to verify factual residence under procedural law.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 25.9.1992 1342/2
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the election board's decision rejecting a voter list correction request. The applicant claimed to have moved to town A in June 1991, but the central register still listed them as residing in town B on January 1, 1992. The court found the board failed to verify the applicant's actual residence as required by the Administrative Procedure Act, necessitating a new review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

VäestökirjaL 9 §; HallintomenettelyL 17 §: The administrative body must actively verify the factual residence of a party before rejecting a request based on official register data, rather than relying solely on the central register.

Keywords

AI generated
voter list correction factual residence verification administrative procedure law central population register election board decision procedural due diligence residence determination

Cited Legislation

AI generated
VäestökirjaL 9 §
HallintomenettelyL 17 §
AI generated
admin_1999_kuopio-county__143
Administrative court dismisses appeal; municipality not liable for care housing to non-resident seeking relocation.
admin_1992_uusimaa-county__1344
Administrative court dismisses appeal where central election board failed to allow hearing before rejecting nomination request.
admin_2011_helsinki__293
Administrative court transfers appeal to court where vehicle owner's domicile was at time of initial tax assessment.
kho-precedent_2006_94
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; municipality of residence remains liable for special care costs after municipal merger.
kho-precedent_1997_118
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against municipal election results due to procedural defects in the election process.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A:n kunnan keskusvaalilautakunta hylkäsi henkilön tekemän

vaaliluettelon oikaisuvaatimuksen, koska henkilön kotipaikka

oli 1.1.1992 väestön keskusrekisterin mukaan edelleenkin

B:n kaupunki. Henkilö oli oikaisuvaatimuksessaan

ilmoittanut muuttaaneensa kesäkuussa 1991 mainitsemaansa

A:n kunnassa olevaan osoitteeseen. Lääninoikeus ei vahvistanut

päätöstä vaan palautti asian keskusvaalilautakunnalle

uudelleen käsiteltäväksi, koksa päätöksestä tai

sen perusteena olleista asiakirjoista ei ilmennyt, että

lautakunta olisi hallintomenettelylain 17 §:n 1 momentissa

säädetyin tavoin huolehtinut henkilöllä 1.1.1992 olleen

tosiasiallisen kotipaikan selvittämisestä.

VäestökirjaL 9 §

HallintomenettelyL 17 §