Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Uudenmaan LO 5.11.1992 1311/6 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed tax authority's claim to increase income without prior request for interest deduction.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 5.11.1992 1311/6
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The administrative court dismissed the tax authority's request to increase the taxpayer's taxable income based on a newly added interest income. Although the tax authority had previously accepted an interest deduction claim during the review, the taxpayer had not explicitly requested an increase in their taxable income in the original tax assessment notice. The court ruled that without such a prior request, the authority lacked the legal basis to retroactively adjust the taxpayer's income to the detriment of the taxpayer.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Verotuslaki 92 § 1 moment; Verotuslaki 82 §: The tax authority cannot increase a taxpayer's taxable income based on new findings or added income items if the taxpayer did not explicitly request such an increase in the original tax assessment notice.

Keywords

AI generated
tax assessment notice interest deduction claim taxable income increase administrative review procedure retroactive adjustment taxpayer's request requirement Verotuslaki provisions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Verotuslaki 92 § 1 moment
Verotuslaki 82 §
AI generated
admin_2003_hameenlinna__488
Administrative court quashes tax board decision for failing to hear tax agent per general administrative procedure law.
admin_1995_turku-and-pori-county__142
CEO's public gift wish to foundation deemed waiver of expected recognition, not taxable income under inheritance law.
kho-precedent_2016_153
Single tax penalty allowed for mixed omissions where intent to evade tax was absent.
kko-other_2014_376
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding tax penalty decisions blocking criminal tax fraud trial.
admin_2021_hameenlinna__502
Tax court allows deduction of insurance excess over destroyed building cost for capital gains calculation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Verovelvollinen oli tutkijalautakunnalle osoittamassaan

veromuistutuksessa vaatinut eräiden korkomenojen vähentämistä.

Tutkijalautakuntakäsittelyn yhteydessä oli verovelvollisen

tuloon samalla kun korkovähennysvaatimus

osittain hyväksyttiin lisätty eräs korkotulo.

Kun verovelvollinen ei ollut veromuistutuksessaan vaatinut

tuloerän lisäämistä veronalaisiin tuloihinsa, tutkijalautakunnan

päätöksen perusteella ei ollut oikeutta verovelvollisen

vahingoksi korottaa hänen veronalaista tuloaan.

VerotusL 92 § 1 mom verrattuna VerotusL 82 §