Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Mikkelin LO 31.3.1992 186 AI generated

Military aid claim dismissed for spouse; court ruled benefit belongs to serviceman, not spouse, due to lack of children.

Case Number Mikkelin LO 31.3.1992 186
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court overturned the Social Board's rejection of a military aid application, ruling that the benefit was intended for the serviceman himself rather than his spouse. The court noted that since the couple had no children, the specific rules regarding dependents did not apply to them. Consequently, the court ordered the case to be reconsidered under provisions allowing the serviceman to claim a portion of living expenses from his own resources.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Sosiaalilautakunnanlaki 1 a §; Military aid is granted to the serviceman personally when no children exist, allowing reimbursement of living expenses from his own resources rather than being treated as a dependent benefit for the spouse.

Keywords

AI generated
military aid entitlement spousal dependency rules living expense reimbursement serviceman personal benefit no children condition administrative court review social board decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Sosiaalilautakunnanlaki 1 a §
AI generated
admin_1992_northern-karelia-county__327
Military assistance claim dismissed; court held spouse's financial status must be considered for special reason test.
admin_1987_mikkeli-county__418
Childcare fee classification based on father's income rejected; classification depends on guardians, not family income.
admin_1986_uusimaa-county__1200
Civil partner exempt from interest on soldier's housing loan but liable for other living costs.
admin_2014_helsinki__439
Legal aid office failed to appoint lawyer per law; court dismissed appeal due to procedural error.
appeal_1981_eastern-finland__602
Court convicted witness for false testimony and accomplices for aiding, excluding lenient sentencing for accomplices.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sosiaalilautakunta oli hylännyt asevelvollisen sotilasavustushakemuksen,

koska hänen avovaimonsa ei tulojensa perusteella

ollut riippuvainen asevelvollisen antamasta avusta.

Lääninoikeus kumosi sosiaalilautakunnan päätöksen ja palautti

asian uudelleen käsiteltäväksi, koska kysymyksessä ei ollut

asevelvollisen omaiselle vaan asevelvolliselle itselleen

annettava sotilasavustus. Asevelvolliseen ja hänen avopuolisoonsa

ei sovellettu omaisia koskevia säännöksiä, koska heillä

ei ollut lapsia. Yhteisasunnossa asuvalle asevelvolliselle

asumiskulut voidaan korvata hänen omaa osuuttaan vastaavalta

osin.

SotilasavustusL 1 a §