Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Kymen LO 14.4.1992 411 AI generated

Student housing support denied when recipient lives in two municipalities simultaneously.

Case Number Kymen LO 14.4.1992 411
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the appeal against the County Administrative Board's order to repay student housing support granted in municipality X. The applicant, living in a common household with a partner in municipality Y while studying in X, had received support in both locations. The court ruled that the applicant could not simultaneously belong to two separate household units for support purposes, rendering the support in X invalid.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

AsumistukiL 1 §; AsumistukiL 19 §: A recipient of housing support cannot simultaneously belong to two different household units for the purpose of receiving support in two different municipalities.

Keywords

AI generated
housing support household unit student housing common household simultaneous residence repayment order administrative court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AsumistukiL 1 §
AsumistukiL 19 §
AI generated
admin_1990_turku-and-pori-county__64
Social assistance denied to non-resident when disability-related renovation costs incurred outside municipality.
insurance_2005_1296-2004
Student housing allowance denied due to free dormitory right without special circumstances; court allows appeal.
insurance_2007_8902-2005
Student housing support allowed for summer break after university enrollment despite prior college dropout.
kho-precedent_2001_41
Income tax gain from selling student housing is taxable as it is not the family's permanent residence.
admin_1990_uusimaa-county__1709
Housing allowance denied to single person studying abroad during military service is invalid.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A:lle oli myönnetty asumistukilain mukaista asumistukea opiskelija-asuntoon

kunnassa X 1.3.1990 lukien. Kunnassa Y hänelle

oli myönnetty asumistukea kaksihenkisen ruokakunnan jäsenenä

varsinaiseen asuntoon 1.1.1990 lukien. A eli avioliitonomaisissa

olosuhteissa avioliittoa solmimatta jatkuvasti

yhteistaloudessa B:n kanssa Y:n kunnassa. Lääninoikeus katsoi,

että A ei voinut samanaikaisesti kuulua eri ruokakuntaan

opiskelupaikkakunnallaan X ja kotipaikkakunnallaan Y, vaan

A:lle kunnassa X myönnetty asumistuki tuli periä takaisin.

AsumistukiL 1 §

AsumistukiL 19 §