Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Kymen LO 15.1.1992 30 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed unemployment benefit repayment claim but allowed interest due to lack of legal basis for interest.

Case Number Kymen LO 15.1.1992 30
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Kymenlaakso ordered the individual to repay unemployment benefits received from June to July 1984, while rejecting the claim for interest. The authority argued that interest should accrue on the full amount, but the court found no legal basis for such a claim. Consequently, the repayment of the principal was upheld, yet the interest demand was dismissed as unlawful.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Työttömyysturvalaki 31 § 1 kohta; Työllisyyslaki 27 a § 1 kohta; Korolaki 1 § 1 kohta; Korolaki 1 § 2 kohta 1 kohta: Unemployment benefits must be returned if obtained without legal basis, but interest is only payable if explicitly authorized by law.

Keywords

AI generated
unemployment benefits repayment obligation interest claim administrative court statutory basis

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Työttömyysturvalaki 31 § 1 kohta
Työllisyyslaki 27 a § 1 kohta
Korolaki 1 § 1 kohta
Korolaki 1 § 2 kohta 1 kohta
AI generated
admin_1995_hame-county__35
Administrative court allows recovery of unemployment benefits under general unjust enrichment principles despite repealed specific statute.
admin_1994_northern-karelia-county__210
Administrative court dismissed claim to recover job placement grant after retroactive law repeal.
appeal_1985_helsinki__751
Court allows partial refund of excessive night and Sunday work allowances due to reliance on past payments.
insurance_2022_21318-2021
Insurance court quashes lower court decision due to lack of appealable ruling on student status termination.
insurance_2012_39-2011
Insurance court allows student to exclude pre-restart income from 2008 study year for benefit recoupment.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Työvoimapiiri vaati perusteettomasti ajalta 1.6.-31.7.1984

saadun työttömyyskorvauksen palauttamista laillisine korkoineen.

Lääninoikeus velvoitti henkilön maksamaan takaisin valtiolle

vaaditun työttömyyskorvauksen. Korkovaatimus hylättiin lakiin

perustumattomana.

TyöttömyysturvaL 31 § 1 mom

TyöllisyysL 3 luku (946/71)

TyöllisyysL 27 a § 1 mom (654/76)

KorkoL 1 § 1 mom

KorkoL 1 § 2 mom 1 kohta