Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vesiylioikeus 14.3.1990 42/1990 AI generated

Administrative court partially allowed request to increase net cage volume from 4500 to 6000 cubic meters.

Case Number Vesiylioikeus 14.3.1990 42/1990
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court partially allowed the applicant's request to increase the total volume of net cages from 4500 to 6000 cubic meters. The lower court deemed the expansion justified due to water protection needs and disease prevention, noting no adverse impact on other rights. Consequently, the court upheld the decision to enlarge the volume while rejecting the appeal on this specific point.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Vesilaki 1990; Kalatalouslaki 1990: The court may approve an increase in net cage volume if environmental protection and fish health requirements are met and no other rights are impaired.

Keywords

AI generated
net cage volume increase water protection requirements fish disease prevention administrative discretion environmental impact assessment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Water Act 1990
Fisheries Act 1990
AI generated
kko-precedent_1990_144
Supreme Court holds violation of water law permit conditions is punishable regardless of actual environmental damage.
admin_1999_water-superior__62
Residence near a water project does not grant standing in a water law permit case.
admin_2026_vaasa__133
Administrative court dismissed appeal against water law enforcement order for over 20 hectares of ditching.
admin_2003_vaasa__261
Environmental permit dismissed for insufficient pre-approval structural capacity assessments violating environmental protection caution principle.
kho-other_2014_957
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against environmental permit for peat production, upholding lower court's decision on damages and fees.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

VEO oli myöntänyt hakijalle luvan pitää verkkoaltaita meressä

ja kasvattaa niissä kalaa ehdoin, että verkkoaltaiden yhteistilavuus

oli enintään 4500 m

ja kalojen lisäkasvu enintään

60.000 kiloa vuodessa.

VYO hyväksyi hakijan vasta VYO:ssa esittämän vaatimuksen allastilavuuden

suurentamisesta 6000 m

:iin, koska suurentaminen

oli vesiensuojelullisesti sekä kalatautien estämisen ja kalan

laadun kannalta perusteltua ja koska allastilavuuden suurentaminen

asemapiirroksen osoittamalla alueella ei vaikuttanut

muiden etuihin ja oikeuksiin. Täysistunto. Äänestys 15-2.

KHO:n päätös T:4010 ja T:4011, A:15.11.1990: Ei valituslupaa

tältä osin