Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vesiylioikeus 19.10.1990 171/1990 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed appeal against water authority's permit for fish hatchery drainage ditch and dam construction.

Case Number Vesiylioikeus 19.10.1990 171/1990
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Finland dismissed the applicant's appeal against the Water Authority's decision to grant a permit for constructing a drainage ditch and dam for a fish hatchery. The Water Authority determined the project was necessary for the general public interest due to the need to manage the fish population. The court upheld the original decision, finding no legal grounds to overturn the authority's assessment of the project's necessity.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

VesiL 2 luku 6 § 2 mom; VesiL 2 luku 8 §; VesiL 8 luku 2 §: The administrative authority's decision to grant a permit for water management infrastructure based on general public interest requirements is valid and binding unless legally flawed.

Keywords

AI generated
water management permit fish hatchery construction general public interest administrative appeal dismissal drainage ditch approval

Cited Legislation

AI generated
VesiL 2 luku 6 § 2 mom
VesiL 2 luku 8 §
VesiL 8 luku 2 §

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KHO:1975-A-II-92
AI generated
admin_2011_oulu__326
Administrative court dismissed wind turbine permit appeal due to landscape damage on nationally valued Hailuoto island.
kho-other_2016_4735
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal against town council's approval of a coastal master plan due to insufficient environmental impact studies.
kho-other_2018_704
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal regarding municipal council decision on nuclear power plant investment participation.
kho-other_2018_908
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal regarding procurement contract where administrative court correctly applied market court jurisdiction exclusion.
kho-other_2015_1678
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal regarding mayor selection where prior candidate was dismissed and new process started.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

VEO myönsi K:n kaupungille luvan luonnonravintolammikon käyttämisessä

tarpeellisen poisto-ojan kaivamiseen ja säännöstelypadon

rakentamiseen sekä vesistön vedenjuoksun säännöstelyyn

ja käyttöoikeuden hanketta varten tarvittavaan A:n omistamaan

tilaan kuuluvaan 1270 mÿ:n alueeseen. VEO katsoi, että kuhakannan

hoitotarpeen takia kuhan poikasten tuottamista tarkoittava

hanke oli yleisen tarpeen vaatima.

VYO ei muuttanut VEO:n päätöstä.

VesiL 2 luku 6 § 2 mom

VesiL 2 luku 8 §

VesiL 8 luku 2 §

KHO:1975-A-II-92

Lainvoimainen