Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Vesiylioikeus 30.1.1990 13/1990 AI generated

Administrative court dismisses appeal when non-party designee's liability claims fall outside water court jurisdiction.

Case Number Vesiylioikeus 30.1.1990 13/1990
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The administrative court dismissed the appeal regarding the environmental protection board's decision because the designee company was not a party to the original excavation case. The appellant argued that disputes arising from the design contract should be handled by water courts, but the court found this matter belonged to civil jurisdiction. Consequently, the water court correctly refused to examine the company's liability claims as they were procedurally inadmissible in this administrative proceeding.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

VesiL 14 luku 1 §; The water court lacks jurisdiction over liability disputes between a landowner and a designee arising from design work if the designee was not a party to the original administrative case.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative court jurisdiction non-party designee water court authority contractual dispute resolution procedural inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
VesiL 14 luku 1 §
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Koska ojituksen suunnitellut yritys ei ollut asianosainen ojitusasiassa

eikä A:n ja yrityksen välillä tehtyyn sopimukseen

perustuvasta suunnittelutyöstä johtuvien erimielisyyksien käsitteleminen

kuulunut vesituomioistuinten toimivaltaan, A:n

ympäristönsuojelulautakunnan päätöksestä tekemässä valituksessa

vesioikeudessa esittämät, yrityksen vastuuta koskevat vaatimukset

jätettiin tutkimatta.

VesiL 14 luku 1 §

Lainvoimainen