Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Uudenmaan LO 25.10.1990 1669/II AI generated

Child care support claim against recipient but not spouse allowed under Finnish law.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 25.10.1990 1669/II
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court allowed the claim for child care support against the designated recipient but rejected it against the spouse. The recipient argued for support based on their status, while the spouse contested liability under the Child Care Act. The court ruled that the statutory provisions specifically exempted the spouse from this particular financial obligation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

L lasten kotihoidon tuesta 5 §; L lasten kotihoidon tuesta 6 §; L lasten-kotihoidon tuesta 8 §; L lasten kotihoidon tuesta 12 §: The court established that child care support obligations apply to the designated recipient but are explicitly excluded for the spouse of the recipient.

Keywords

AI generated
child care support spousal exemption administrative liability financial obligation recipient status

Cited Legislation

AI generated
L lasten kotihoidon tuesta 5 §
L lasten kotihoidon tuesta 5 §
L lasten kotihoidon tuesta 6 §
L lasten kotihoidon tuesta 6 §
L lasten-kotihoidon tuesta 8 §
L lasten-kotihoidon tuesta 8 §
L lasten kotihoidon tuesta 12 §
L lasten kotihoidon tuesta 12 §

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KHO:n päätös T:2909 A:30.8.1991
KHO:n päätös T:2909 A:30.8.1991 : Ei muutosta
AI generated
admin_2017_eastern-finland__128
Administrative court partially dismissed claim for recovery of social assistance, ruling child support applies but spousal share does not.
admin_2005_turku__171
Social Board lacked authority to deduct July support from September payment due to pending administrative dispute.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2025:47
Supreme Administrative Court allows residence permit as family member despite alienation by other guardian.
insurance_2002_785-2001
Maternity leave time cannot be counted as employment for intermittent leave benefit eligibility under Finnish law.
kho-precedent_2011_43
Supreme Administrative Court allows residence permit based on family reunification with third-party financial guarantee.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Aiheettomasti saatu lasten kotihoidon tuki voitiin periä

takaisin hakemuksessa tuen saajaksi merkityltä henkilöltä,

mutta ei hänen aviopuolisoltaan.

L lasten kotihoidon tuesta 5 §

L lasten kotihoidon tuesta 6 §

L lasten-kotihoidon tuesta 8 §

L lasten kotihoidon tuesta 12 §

KHO:n päätös T:2909 A:30.8.1991 : Ei muutosta