Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Oulun LO 24.5.1990 486/II AI generated

Administrative court dismissed appeal for child home care support during mother's short-term leave when daycare was available.

Case Number Oulun LO 24.5.1990 486/II
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Oulu dismissed the applicant's appeal regarding the denial of child home care support during the mother's short-term leave. The Social Committee upheld the rejection because the child had a publicly arranged daycare spot for the entire leave period, and the applicant had not terminated it. The court ruled that since alternative care was secured, the applicant was not entitled to additional home care funding for this temporary absence.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Laki lasten kotihoidon tuesta 1 § 1 mom; 1 § 2 mom: When a child has a publicly arranged daycare facility available during a parent's leave, the applicant is not entitled to home care support for that period.

Keywords

AI generated
child home care support short-term leave daycare availability administrative appeal social assistance denial

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Laki lasten kotihoidon tuesta 1 § 1 mom
Laki lasten kotihoidon tuesta annetun lain voimaanpanosta 1 § 2 mom
Laki lasten kotihoidon tuesta annetun lain voimaanpanosta 1 § 4 mom
AI generated
admin_1992_mikkeli-county__805
Administrative court dismisses parental claim for home care support when child attends kindergarten during summer break.
admin_1991_northern-karelia-county__463
Student's summer childcare support claim dismissed due to concurrent day care entitlement.
admin_1994_uusimaa-county__953
County court quashes social board decision limiting home care support to first care group only.
admin_1994_uusimaa-county__680
Administrative court allows daycare fee as income when public daycare is available but not chosen.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2018:18
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal dismissal where child's hospital care prevents home care support eligibility despite statutory flexibility.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Oikeuskysymyksenä asiassa oli lasten kotihoidon tuen suorittaminen

silloin, kun lapsen äiti oli lyhytaikaisella

virkavapaalla ja lasta tällöin hänelle kunnan toimesta

varatusta päivähoitopaikasta huolimatta hoidetaan kotona.

Sosiaalilautakunta oli tekemällään päätöksellä pysyttänyt

viranhaltijan päätöksen, jolla hakemus lasten kotihoidon

tuen saamiseksi äidin virkavapauden ajaksi 3.7. - 11.8.1989

oli hylätty, koska lapselle oli varattu päivähoitopaikka

sekä 31.7.1989 päättyneelle että 1.8.1989 alkaneelle toimikaudelle.

Ottaen huomioon sen, että lapselle oli kunnan toimesta ollut

varattuna päivähoitopaikka eikä valittaja ollut irtisanonut

sitä, lääninoikeus katsoi, että valittajalla ei

lapsen tilapäisen poissaolon vuoksi ollut oikeutta saada

kotihoidon tukea virkavapausajaltaan. Lääninoikeus hylkäsi

valituksen.

L lasten kotihoidon tuesta 1 § 1 mom (24/1985)

L lasten kotihoidon tuesta annetun lain voimaanpanosta -

1 § 2 mom

L lasten kotihoidon tuesta annetun lain voimaanpanosta -

1 § 4 mom