Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Kymen LO 6.2.1990 102 AI generated

Administrative court denied pension reduction due to 64% disability, rejecting minor's claim for full reduction.

Case Number Kymen LO 6.2.1990 102
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Kymenlaakso dismissed a minor's claim for a pension reduction under PerVL 12 § 3. The court found that while the minor received an early disability pension, the permanent disability level caused by various illnesses was only 64%. Consequently, the court ruled that the statutory conditions for a full reduction were not met based on this specific percentage.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

PerVL 12 § 3; The court held that a pension reduction for inability to work requires a permanent disability level meeting statutory thresholds, and a 64% disability rating does not satisfy the criteria for a full reduction.

Keywords

AI generated
pension reduction disability percentage early disability pension inability to work administrative court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
PerVL 12 § 3
perusteella, ollut oikeutta PerVL 12 § 3 kohdan mukaiseen
AI generated
insurance_2001_585-2001
Insurance Court allows disability pension based on same disease despite prior recovery period.
insurance_1984_1380-1984
Insurance court grants disability pension to construction foreman with personality disorder despite diabetes denial.
insurance_1983_5014-1982
Insurance court denies disability claim for construction worker with neck injury and arthritis.
insurance_2002_4049-1999
Insurance Court quashed decision for violating EU Regulation 574/72 procedural rules on cross-border pension appeals.
insurance_1986_2256-1985
Insurance court reduces disability rating from 100% to 50% due to another person's participation in farm work.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Lääninoikeus katsoi, ettei rintaperillisellä, jolle oli

myönnetty yksilöllinen varhaiseläke (KEL 22 a §) sairauden

perusteella, ollut oikeutta PerVL 12 § 3 kohdan mukaiseen

ansiotyöhön kykenemättömän vähennykseen, koska eri sairauksista

johtunut pysyvä haitta-aste oli vain 64 %.

Verovuosi 1989

Äänestys 2-1

Vähemmistö olisi myöntänyt vähennyksen.

PerVL 12 § 3 kohta