Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Hämeen LO 27.8.1990 646/I AI generated

Fire safety order not final; administrative court dismisses appeal as it lacks finality for review.

Case Number Hämeen LO 27.8.1990 646/I
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The administrative court dismissed the appeal against a fire safety order issued by a fire inspector. The lower authority argued that the order did not constitute a final decision subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act. The court agreed, ruling that the matter must first be referred to the regional government for examination of the order's legality.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Laki palo- ja pelastustoimesta 47 §; Laki muutoksenhausta hallintoasioissa 3 § 1 mom: An administrative order issued by a fire inspector pursuant to the Fire and Rescue Act is not a final decision subject to appeal if it merely requires compliance and does not itself resolve the underlying legal dispute.

Keywords

AI generated
fire safety order administrative procedure final decision judicial review regional government referral

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Laki palo- ja pelastustoimesta 46 § 1 mom
Laki palo- ja pelastustoimesta 46 § 1 mom
Laki palo- ja pelastustoimesta 47 §
Laki palo- ja pelastustoimesta 47 §
Laki muutoksenhausta hallintoasioissa 3 § 1 mom
Laki muutoksenhausta hallintoasioissa 3 § 1 mom
Laki muutoksenhausta hallintoasioissa 4 §
Laki muutoksenhausta hallintoasioissa 4 §

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KULO T:132/II A:26.2.1987
KULO T:132/II A:26.2.1987
MLO T:924 A:28.10.1988
Vrt. MLO T:924 A:28.10.1988
AI generated
admin_1988_mikkeli-county__924
Administrative court dismissed appeal against fire chief's orders under Fire and Rescue Act s. 47 despite no threat.
admin_1987_kuopio-county__132
Fire inspector's repair order is not a reviewable administrative decision under Finnish law.
admin_1995_central-finland-county__740
Administrative court dismissed appeal by transferring fire inspection order to municipal board under municipal law.
kho-precedent_2015_101
Court dismisses appeal regarding environmental permit condition expiry due to legislative change. The court held that a specific condition for plan submission did not constitute a mandatory review obligation. The court ruled that the condition was not a review obligation subject to legislative change. The court found no grounds to alter the administrative court's decision based on the case facts. The court determined the condition was not a review obligation under the new law. The court concluded the condition was not a review obligation under the new law.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2021:81
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal without permission for auditor warning cases under specific audit law provisions.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Palotarkastaja oli kiinteistöllä suorittamansa palotarkastuksen perusteella antanut kiinteistön omistajalle paloturvallisuutta koskevia määräyksiä palo- ja pelastustoimesta annetun lain 47 §:n 1 momentin perusteella.

Mikäli palotarkastajan määräystä ei noudateta, palopäällikön on palo- ja pelastustoimesta annetun lain 47 §:n 2 momentin nojalla saatettava asia lääninhallituksen käsiteltäväksi. Tässä yhteydessä tulevat tutkittavaksi ja ratkaistavaksi palotarkastajan määräysten lainmukaisuus. Lääninoikeus katsoi, ettei valituksenalainen palotarkastajan määräys näin ollen sisältänyt sellaista lopullista ratkaisua, johon voitiin hakea muutosta valittamalla.

Laki palo- ja pelastustoimesta 46 § 1 mom

Laki palo- ja pelastustoimesta 47 §

Laki muutoksenhausta hallintoasioissa 3 § 1 mom

Laki muutoksenhausta hallintoasioissa 4 §

Vrt. KULO T:132/II A:26.2.1987

Vrt. MLO T:924 A:28.10.1988