Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vesiylioikeus 12.5.1989 74/1989 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed owner's claim for official aid to replace a dam blocking navigation.

Case Number Vesiylioikeus 12.5.1989 74/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the owner's application for official aid to replace a dam obstructing navigation. The owner argued the dam significantly hindered their property's use and navigation, citing specific water law provisions. The court rejected the claim because the applicant failed to demonstrate that the navigation connection was of significant importance to the property's use.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

VesiL 1 luku 9 §; VesiL 21 luku 3 § 1 mom: Official aid for replacing a dam blocking navigation is granted only if the navigation connection is of significant importance to the property's use.

Keywords

AI generated
official aid navigation connection property use dam removal water law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
VesiL 1 luku 9 §
VesiL 21 luku 3 § 1 mom

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Pietilä, Vesioikeus (1979) s.148
Pietilä, Vesioikeus (1979) s.148
KHO:n päätös T:3877, A:31.10.1989
KHO:n päätös T:3877, A:31.10.1989: Ei valituslupaa hakijalle
AI generated
kho-other_2017_4566
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal regarding road advertising permit denial based on missing photos for statutory discretion.
kho-other_2015_3834
Appeal dismissed; connection exemption requires health/environmental safety, not just financial hardship.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2023:108
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal, quashing permit due to insufficient survey and flawed interest comparison in floating bridge case.
admin_1989_water-superior__164
Administrative court orders municipality to compensate for increased pollution damage due to negligence in pipe repair.
kho-other_2016_1146
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal and oral hearing request regarding noise limits in port expansion case.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Lampeen ja siitä lähtevään puroon rajoittuvan kiinteistön

omistajlla oli oikeus hakea virka-apua veneliikenteen purosta

järvelle estävän putkirummun korvaamiseksi veneliikenteen mahdollistavalla

sillalla, kun veneliikenneyhteydellä hakijan

ilmoituksen mukaan oli merkitystä kiinteistön käytölle.

VesiL 1 luku 9 §

VesiL 21 luku 3 § 1 mom

Pietilä, Vesioikeus (1979) s.148

KHO:n päätös T:3877, A:31.10.1989: Ei valituslupaa hakijalle